BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Floris Geerts

Floris Geerts contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceDatabasesLogic in Computer Sciencemath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Expressiveness and Approximation Properties of Graph Neural Networks

Characterizing the separation power of graph neural networks (GNNs) provides an understanding of their limitations for graph learning tasks. Results regarding separation power are, however, usually geared at specific GNN architectures, and tools for understanding arbitrary GNN architectures are generally lacking. We provide an elegant way to easily obtain bounds on the separation power of GNNs in terms of the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) tests, which have become the yardstick to measure the separation power of GNNs. The crux is to view GNNs as expressions in a procedural tensor language describing the computations in the layers of the GNNs. Then, by a simple analysis of the obtained expressions, in terms of the number of indexes and the nesting depth of summations, bounds on the separation power in terms of the WL-tests readily follow. We use tensor language to define Higher-Order Message-Passing Neural Networks (or k-MPNNs), a natural extension of MPNNs. Furthermore, the tensor language point of view allows for the derivation of universality results for classes of GNNs in a natural way. Our approach provides a toolbox with which GNN architecture designers can analyze the separation power of their GNNs, without needing to know the intricacies of the WL-tests. We also provide insights in what is needed to boost the separation power of GNNs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the expressive power of message-passing neural networks as global feature map transformers

We investigate the power of message-passing neural networks (MPNNs) in their capacity to transform the numerical features stored in the nodes of their input graphs. Our focus is on global expressive power, uniformly over all input graphs, or over graphs of bounded degree with features from a bounded domain. Accordingly, we introduce the notion of a global feature map transformer (GFMT). As a yardstick for expressiveness, we use a basic language for GFMTs, which we call MPLang. Every MPNN can be expressed in MPLang, and our results clarify to which extent the converse inclusion holds. We consider exact versus approximate expressiveness; the use of arbitrary activation functions; and the case where only the ReLU activation function is allowed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Let's Agree to Degree: Comparing Graph Convolutional Networks in the Message-Passing Framework

In this paper we cast neural networks defined on graphs as message-passing neural networks (MPNNs) in order to study the distinguishing power of different classes of such models. We are interested in whether certain architectures are able to tell vertices apart based on the feature labels given as input with the graph. We consider two variants of MPNNS: anonymous MPNNs whose message functions depend only on the labels of vertices involved; and degree-aware MPNNs in which message functions can additionally use information regarding the degree of vertices. The former class covers a popular formalisms for computing functions on graphs: graph neural networks (GNN). The latter covers the so-called graph convolutional networks (GCNs), a recently introduced variant of GNNs by Kipf and Welling. We obtain lower and upper bounds on the distinguishing power of MPNNs in terms of the distinguishing power of the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) algorithm. Our results imply that (i) the distinguishing power of GCNs is bounded by the WL algorithm, but that they are one step ahead; (ii) the WL algorithm cannot be simulated by "plain vanilla" GCNs but the addition of a trade-off parameter between features of the vertex and those of its neighbours (as proposed by Kipf and Welling themselves) resolves this problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the expressive power of linear algebra on graphs

Most graph query languages are rooted in logic. By contrast, in this paper we consider graph query languages rooted in linear algebra. More specifically, we consider MATLANG, a matrix query language recently introduced, in which some basic linear algebra functionality is supported. We investigate the problem of characterising equivalence of graphs, represented by their adjacency matrices, for various fragments of MATLANG. A complete picture is painted of the impact of the linear algebra operations in MATLANG on their ability to distinguish graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The expressive power of kth-order invariant graph networks

The expressive power of graph neural network formalisms is commonly measured by their ability to distinguish graphs. For many formalisms, the k-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman (k-WL) graph isomorphism test is used as a yardstick. In this paper we consider the expressive power of kth-order invariant (linear) graph networks (k-IGNs). It is known that k-IGNs are expressive enough to simulate k-WL. This means that for any two graphs that can be distinguished by k-WL, one can find a k-IGN which also distinguishes those graphs. The question remains whether k-IGNs can distinguish more graphs than k-WL. This was recently shown to be false for k=2. Here, we generalise this result to arbitrary k. In other words, we show that k-IGNs are bounded in expressive power by k-WL. This implies that k-IGNs and k-WL are equally powerful in distinguishing graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Walk Message Passing Neural Networks and Second-Order Graph Neural Networks

The expressive power of message passing neural networks (MPNNs) is known to match the expressive power of the 1-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman graph (1-WL) isomorphism test. To boost the expressive power of MPNNs, a number of graph neural network architectures have recently been proposed based on higher-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman tests. In this paper we consider the two-dimensional (2-WL) test and introduce a new type of MPNNs, referred to as $\ell$-walk MPNNs, which aggregate features along walks of length $\ell$ between vertices. We show that $2$-walk MPNNs match 2-WL in expressive power. More generally, $\ell$-walk MPNNs, for any $\ell\geq 2$, are shown to match the expressive power of the recently introduced $\ell$-walk refinement procedure (W[$\ell$]). Based on a correspondence between 2-WL and W[$\ell$], we observe that $\ell$-walk MPNNs and $2$-walk MPNNs have the same expressive power, i.e., they can distinguish the same pairs of graphs, but $\ell$-walk MPNNs can possibly distinguish pairs of graphs faster than $2$-walk MPNNs. When it comes to concrete learnable graph neural network (GNN) formalisms that match 2-WL or W[$\ell$] in expressive power, we consider second-order graph neural networks that allow for non-linear layers. In particular, to match W[$\ell$] in expressive power, we allow $\ell-1$ matrix multiplications in each layer. We propose different versions of second-order GNNs depending on the type of features (i.e., coming from a countable set, or coming from an uncountable set) as this affects the number of dimensions needed to represent the features. Our results indicate that increasing non-linearity in layers by means of allowing multiple matrix multiplications does not increase expressive power. At the very best, it results in a faster distinction of input graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access