Source author record

Finn Dag Hovem

Finn Dag Hovem appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Probabilistic forecasts of wind power generation in regions with complex topography using deep learning methods: An Arctic case

The energy market relies on forecasting capabilities of both demand and power generation that need to be kept in dynamic balance. Today, when it comes to renewable energy generation, such decisions are increasingly made in a liberalized electricity market environment, where future power generation must be offered through contracts and auction mechanisms, hence based on forecasts. The increased share of highly intermittent power generation from renewable energy sources increases the uncertainty about the expected future power generation. Point forecast does not account for such uncertainties. To account for these uncertainties, it is possible to make probabilistic forecasts. This work first presents important concepts and approaches concerning probabilistic forecasts with deep learning. Then, deep learning models are used to make probabilistic forecasts of day-ahead power generation from a wind power plant located in Northern Norway. The performance in terms of obtained quality of the prediction intervals is compared for different deep learning models and sets of covariates. The findings show that the accuracy of the predictions improves when historical data on measured weather and numerical weather predictions (NWPs) were included as exogenous variables. This allows the model to auto-correct systematic biases in the NWPs using the historical measurement data. Using only NWPs, or only measured weather as exogenous variables, worse prediction performances were obtained.