Researcher profile

Finn Dag Hovem

Finn Dag Hovem contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Probabilistic forecasts of wind power generation in regions with complex topography using deep learning methods: An Arctic case

The energy market relies on forecasting capabilities of both demand and power generation that need to be kept in dynamic balance. Today, when it comes to renewable energy generation, such decisions are increasingly made in a liberalized electricity market environment, where future power generation must be offered through contracts and auction mechanisms, hence based on forecasts. The increased share of highly intermittent power generation from renewable energy sources increases the uncertainty about the expected future power generation. Point forecast does not account for such uncertainties. To account for these uncertainties, it is possible to make probabilistic forecasts. This work first presents important concepts and approaches concerning probabilistic forecasts with deep learning. Then, deep learning models are used to make probabilistic forecasts of day-ahead power generation from a wind power plant located in Northern Norway. The performance in terms of obtained quality of the prediction intervals is compared for different deep learning models and sets of covariates. The findings show that the accuracy of the predictions improves when historical data on measured weather and numerical weather predictions (NWPs) were included as exogenous variables. This allows the model to auto-correct systematic biases in the NWPs using the historical measurement data. Using only NWPs, or only measured weather as exogenous variables, worse prediction performances were obtained.