BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ferdian Thung

Ferdian Thung contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software EngineeringMachine LearningMultimedia

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Automatic Pull Request Title Generation

Pull Requests (PRs) are a mechanism on modern collaborative coding platforms, such as GitHub. PRs allow developers to tell others that their code changes are available for merging into another branch in a repository. A PR needs to be reviewed and approved by the core team of the repository before the changes are merged into the branch. Usually, reviewers need to identify a PR that is in line with their interests before providing a review. By default, PRs are arranged in a list view that shows the titles of PRs. Therefore, it is desirable to have a precise and concise title, which is beneficial for both reviewers and other developers. However, it is often the case that developers do not provide good titles; we find that many existing PR titles are either inappropriate in length (i.e., too short or too long) or fail to convey useful information, which may result in PR being ignored or rejected. Therefore, there is a need for automatic techniques to help developers draft high-quality titles. In this paper, we introduce the task of automatic generation of PR titles. We formulate the task as a one-sentence summarization task. To facilitate the research on this task, we construct a dataset that consists of 43,816 PRs from 495 GitHub repositories. We evaluated the state-of-the-art summarization approaches for the automatic PR title generation task. We leverage ROUGE metrics to automatically evaluate the summarization approaches and conduct a manual evaluation. The experimental results indicate that BART is the best technique for generating satisfactory PR titles with ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, and ROUGE-L F1-scores of 47.22, 25.27, and 43.12, respectively. The manual evaluation also shows that the titles generated by BART are preferred.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

AutoPRTitle: A Tool for Automatic Pull Request Title Generation

With the rise of the pull request mechanism in software development, the quality of pull requests has gained more attention. Prior works focus on improving the quality of pull request descriptions and several approaches have been proposed to automatically generate pull request descriptions. As an essential component of a pull request, pull request titles have not received a similar level of attention. To further facilitate automation in software development and to help developers in drafting high-quality pull request titles, we introduce AutoPRTitle. AutoPRTitle is specifically designed to automatically generate pull request titles. AutoPRTitle can generate a precise and succinct pull request title based on the pull request description, commit messages, and the associated issue titles. AutoPRTitle is built upon a state-of-the-art text summarization model, BART, which has been pre-trained on large-scale English corpora. We further fine-tuned BART in a pull request dataset containing high-quality pull request titles. We implemented AutoPRTitle as a stand-alone web application. We conducted two sets of evaluations: one concerning the model accuracy and the other concerning the tool usability. For model accuracy, BART outperforms the best baseline by 24.6%, 40.5%, and 23.3%, respectively. For tool usability, the evaluators consider our tool as easy-to-use and useful when creating a pull request title of good quality. Source code: https://github.com/soarsmu/Auto-PR-Title Video demo: https://tinyurl.com/AutoPRTitle

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Efficient Search of Live-Coding Screencasts from Online Videos

Programming videos on the Internet are valuable resources for learning programming skills. To find relevant videos, developers typically search online video platforms (e.g., YouTube) with keywords on topics they wish to learn. Developers often look for live-coding screencasts, in which the videos' authors perform live coding. Yet, not all programming videos are live-coding screencasts. In this work, we develop a tool named PSFinder to identify live-coding screencasts. PSFinder leverages a classifier to identify whether a video frame contains an IDE window. It uses a sampling strategy to pick a number of frames from an input video, runs the classifer on these frames, and then determines whether the video is a live-coding screencast based on frames classified as containing IDE window. In our preliminary experiment, PSFinder can effectively identify live-coding screencasts as it achieves an F1-score of 0.97.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

iTiger: An Automatic Issue Title Generation Tool

In both commercial and open-source software, bug reports or issues are used to track bugs or feature requests. However, the quality of issues can differ a lot. Prior research has found that bug reports with good quality tend to gain more attention than the ones with poor quality. As an essential component of an issue, title quality is an important aspect of issue quality. Moreover, issues are usually presented in a list view, where only the issue title and some metadata are present. In this case, a concise and accurate title is crucial for readers to grasp the general concept of the issue and facilitate the issue triaging. Previous work formulated the issue title generation task as a one-sentence summarization task. A sequence-to-sequence model was employed to solve this task. However, it requires a large amount of domain-specific training data to attain good performance in issue title generation. Recently, pre-trained models, which learned knowledge from large-scale general corpora, have shown much success in software engineering tasks. In this work, we make the first attempt to fine-tune BART, which has been pre-trained using English corpora, to generate issue titles. We implemented the fine-tuned BART as a web tool named iTiger, which can suggest an issue title based on the issue description. iTiger is fine-tuned on 267,094 GitHub issues. We compared iTiger with the state-of-the-art method, i.e., iTAPE, on 33,438 issues. The automatic evaluation shows that iTiger outperforms iTAPE by 29.7%, 50.8%, and 34.1%, in terms of ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L F1-scores. The manual evaluation also demonstrates the titles generated by BART are preferred by evaluators over the titles generated by iTAPE in 72.7% of cases. Besides, the evaluators deem our tool as useful and easy-to-use. They are also interested to use our tool in the future.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Effectiveness of Pretrained Models for API Learning

Developers frequently use APIs to implement certain functionalities, such as parsing Excel Files, reading and writing text files line by line, etc. Developers can greatly benefit from automatic API usage sequence generation based on natural language queries for building applications in a faster and cleaner manner. Existing approaches utilize information retrieval models to search for matching API sequences given a query or use RNN-based encoder-decoder to generate API sequences. As it stands, the first approach treats queries and API names as bags of words. It lacks deep comprehension of the semantics of the queries. The latter approach adapts a neural language model to encode a user query into a fixed-length context vector and generate API sequences from the context vector. We want to understand the effectiveness of recent Pre-trained Transformer based Models (PTMs) for the API learning task. These PTMs are trained on large natural language corpora in an unsupervised manner to retain contextual knowledge about the language and have found success in solving similar Natural Language Processing (NLP) problems. However, the applicability of PTMs has not yet been explored for the API sequence generation task. We use a dataset that contains 7 million annotations collected from GitHub to evaluate the PTMs empirically. This dataset was also used to assess previous approaches. Based on our results, PTMs generate more accurate API sequences and outperform other related methods by around 11%. We have also identified two different tokenization approaches that can contribute to a significant boost in PTMs' performance for the API sequence generation task.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

AndroEvolve: Automated Update for Android Deprecated-API Usages

Android operating system (OS) is often updated, where each new version may involve API deprecation. Usages of deprecated APIs in Android apps need to be updated to ensure the apps' compatibility with the old and new versions of Android OS. In this work, we propose AndroEvolve, an automated tool to update usages of deprecated Android APIs, that addresses the limitations of the state-of-the-art tool, CocciEvolve. AndroEvolve utilizes data flow analysis to solve the problem of out-of-method-boundary variables, and variable denormalization to remove the temporary variables introduced by CocciEvolve. We evaluated the accuracy of AndroEvolve using a dataset of 360 target files and 20 deprecated Android APIs, where AndroEvolve is able to produce 319 correct updates, compared to CocciEvolve which only produces 249 correct updates. We also evaluated the readability of AndroEvolve's update results using a manual and an automatic evaluation. Both evaluations demonstrated that the code produced by AndroEvolve has higher readability than CocciEvolve's. A video demonstration of AndroEvolve is available at https://youtu.be/siU0tuMITXI.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Automatic Android Deprecated-API Usage Update by Learning from Single Updated Example

Due to the deprecation of APIs in the Android operating system,developers have to update usages of the APIs to ensure that their applications work for both the past and current versions of Android.Such updates may be widespread, non-trivial, and time-consuming. Therefore, automation of such updates will be of great benefit to developers. AppEvolve, which is the state-of-the-art tool for automating such updates, relies on having before- and after-update examples to learn from. In this work, we propose an approach named CocciEvolve that performs such updates using only a single after-update example. CocciEvolve learns edits by extracting the relevant update to a block of code from an after-update example. From preliminary experiments, we find that CocciEvolve can successfully perform 96 out of 112 updates, with a success rate of 85%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access