Researcher profile

Felix Ritchie

Felix Ritchie contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Machine Learning Models Disclosure from Trusted Research Environments (TRE), Challenges and Opportunities

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare and medicine have increased in recent years. To enable access to personal data, Trusted Research environments (TREs) provide safe and secure environments in which researchers can access sensitive personal data and develop Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning models. However currently few TREs support the use of automated AI-based modelling using Machine Learning. Early attempts have been made in the literature to present and introduce privacy preserving machine learning from the design point of view [1]. However, there exists a gap in the practical decision-making guidance for TREs in handling models disclosure. Specifically, the use of machine learning creates a need to disclose new types of outputs from TREs, such as trained machine learning models. Although TREs have clear policies for the disclosure of statistical outputs, the extent to which trained models can leak personal training data once released is not well understood and guidelines do not exist within TREs for the safe disclosure of these models. In this paper we introduce the challenge of disclosing trained machine learning models from TREs. We first give an overview of machine learning models in general and describe some of their applications in healthcare and medicine. We define the main vulnerabilities of trained machine learning models in general. We also describe the main factors affecting the vulnerabilities of disclosing machine learning models. This paper also provides insights and analyses methods that could be introduced within TREs to mitigate the risk of privacy breaches when disclosing trained models.

preprint2019arXiv

Confidentiality and linked data

Data providers such as government statistical agencies perform a balancing act: maximising information published to inform decision-making and research, while simultaneously protecting privacy. The emergence of identified administrative datasets with the potential for sharing (and thus linking) offers huge potential benefits but significant additional risks. This article introduces the principles and methods of linking data across different sources and points in time, focusing on potential areas of risk. We then consider confidentiality risk, focusing in particular on the "intruder" problem central to the area, and looking at both risks from data producer outputs and from the release of micro-data for further analysis. Finally, we briefly consider potential solutions to micro-data release, both the statistical solutions considered in other contributed articles and non-statistical solutions.