BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Fabian Scheipl

Fabian Scheipl contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningMethodologyApplications

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A geometric framework for outlier detection in high-dimensional data

Outlier or anomaly detection is an important task in data analysis. We discuss the problem from a geometrical perspective and provide a framework that exploits the metric structure of a data set. Our approach rests on the manifold assumption, i.e., that the observed, nominally high-dimensional data lie on a much lower dimensional manifold and that this intrinsic structure can be inferred with manifold learning methods. We show that exploiting this structure significantly improves the detection of outlying observations in high-dimensional data. We also suggest a novel, mathematically precise, and widely applicable distinction between distributional and structural outliers based on the geometry and topology of the data manifold that clarifies conceptual ambiguities prevalent throughout the literature. Our experiments focus on functional data as one class of structured high-dimensional data, but the framework we propose is completely general and we include image and graph data applications. Our results show that the outlier structure of high-dimensional and non-tabular data can be detected and visualized using manifold learning methods and quantified using standard outlier scoring methods applied to the manifold embedding vectors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Enhancing cluster analysis via topological manifold learning

We discuss topological aspects of cluster analysis and show that inferring the topological structure of a dataset before clustering it can considerably enhance cluster detection: theoretical arguments and empirical evidence show that clustering embedding vectors, representing the structure of a data manifold instead of the observed feature vectors themselves, is highly beneficial. To demonstrate, we combine manifold learning method UMAP for inferring the topological structure with density-based clustering method DBSCAN. Synthetic and real data results show that this both simplifies and improves clustering in a diverse set of low- and high-dimensional problems including clusters of varying density and/or entangled shapes. Our approach simplifies clustering because topological pre-processing consistently reduces parameter sensitivity of DBSCAN. Clustering the resulting embeddings with DBSCAN can then even outperform complex methods such as SPECTACL and ClusterGAN. Finally, our investigation suggests that the crucial issue in clustering does not appear to be the nominal dimension of the data or how many irrelevant features it contains, but rather how \textit{separable} the clusters are in the ambient observation space they are embedded in, which is usually the (high-dimensional) Euclidean space defined by the features of the data. Our approach is successful because we perform the cluster analysis after projecting the data into a more suitable space that is optimized for separability, in some sense.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Benchmarking time series classification -- Functional data vs machine learning approaches

Time series classification problems have drawn increasing attention in the machine learning and statistical community. Closely related is the field of functional data analysis (FDA): it refers to the range of problems that deal with the analysis of data that is continuously indexed over some domain. While often employing different methods, both fields strive to answer similar questions, a common example being classification or regression problems with functional covariates. We study methods from functional data analysis, such as functional generalized additive models, as well as functionality to concatenate (functional-) feature extraction or basis representations with traditional machine learning algorithms like support vector machines or classification trees. In order to assess the methods and implementations, we run a benchmark on a wide variety of representative (time series) data sets, with in-depth analysis of empirical results, and strive to provide a reference ranking for which method(s) to use for non-expert practitioners. Additionally, we provide a software framework in R for functional data analysis for supervised learning, including machine learning and more linear approaches from statistics. This allows convenient access, and in connection with the machine-learning toolbox mlr, those methods can now also be tuned and benchmarked.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Statistical Inference for Ordinal Predictors in Generalized Linear and Additive Models with Application to Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Discrete but ordered covariates are quite common in applied statistics, and some regularized fitting procedures have been proposed for proper handling of ordinal predictors in statistical modeling. In this study, we show how quadratic penalties on adjacent dummy coefficients of ordinal predictors proposed in the literature can be incorporated in the framework of generalized additive models, making tools for statistical inference developed there available for ordinal predictors as well. Motivated by an application from neonatal medicine, we discuss whether results obtained when constructing confidence intervals and testing significance of smooth terms in generalized additive models are useful with ordinal predictors/penalties as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

A General Framework for Multivariate Functional Principal Component Analysis of Amplitude and Phase Variation

Functional data typically contains amplitude and phase variation. In many data situations, phase variation is treated as a nuisance effect and is removed during preprocessing, although it may contain valuable information. In this note, we focus on joint principal component analysis (PCA) of amplitude and phase variation. As the space of warping functions has a complex geometric structure, one key element of the analysis is transforming the warping functions to $L^2(\mathcal{T})$. We present different transformation approaches and show how they fit into a general class of transformations. This allows us to compare their strengths and limitations. In the context of PCA, our results offer arguments in favour of the centered log-ratio transformation. We further embed existing approaches from Hadjipantelis et al. (2015) and Lee and Jung (2017) for joint PCA of amplitude and phase variation into the framework of multivariate functional PCA, where we study the properties of the estimators based on an appropriate metric. The approach is illustrated through an application from seismology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access