BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Eduard Eiben

Eduard Eiben contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational GeometryDiscrete MathematicsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the parameterized complexity of symmetric directed multicut

We study the problem Symmetric Directed Multicut from a parameterized complexity perspective. In this problem, the input is a digraph $D$, a set of cut requests $C=\{(s_1,t_1),\ldots,(s_\ell,t_\ell)\}$ and an integer $k$, and the task is to find a set $X \subseteq V(D)$ of size at most $k$ such that for every $1 \leq i \leq \ell$, $X$ intersects either all $(s_i,t_i)$-paths or all $(t_i,s_i)$-paths. Equivalently, every strongly connected component of $D-X$ contains at most one vertex out of $s_i$ and $t_i$ for every $i$. This problem is previously known from research in approximation algorithms, where it is known to have an $O(\log k \log \log k)$-approximation. We note that the problem, parameterized by $k$, directly generalizes multiple interesting FPT problems such as (Undirected) Vertex Multicut and Directed Subset Feedback Vertex Set. We are not able to settle the existence of an FPT algorithm parameterized purely by $k$, but we give three partial results: An FPT algorithm parameterized by $k+\ell$; an FPT-time 2-approximation parameterized by $k$; and an FPT algorithm parameterized by $k$ for the special case that the cut requests form a clique, Symmetric Directed Multiway Cut. The existence of an FPT algorithm parameterized purely by $k$ remains an intriguing open possibility.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Parameterized Complexity of Welfare Guarantees in Schelling Segregation

Schelling's model considers $k$ types of agents each of whom needs to select a vertex on an undirected graph, where every agent prefers to neighbor agents of the same type. We are motivated by a recent line of work that studies solutions that are optimal with respect to notions related to the welfare of the agents. We explore the parameterized complexity of computing such solutions. We focus on the well-studied notions of social welfare (WO) and Pareto optimality (PO), alongside the recently proposed notions of group-welfare optimality (GWO) and utility-vector optimality (UVO), both of which lie between WO and PO. Firstly, we focus on the fundamental case where $k=2$ and there are $r$ red agents and $b$ blue agents. We show that all solution-notions we consider are $\textsf{NP}$-hard to compute even when $b=1$ and that they are $\textsf{W}[1]$-hard when parameterized by $r$ and $b$. In addition, we show that WO and GWO are $\textsf{NP}$-hard even on cubic graphs. We complement these negative results by an $\textsf{FPT}$ algorithm parameterized by $r, b$ and the maximum degree of the graph. For the general case with $k$ types of agents, we prove that for any of the notions we consider the problem is $\textsf{W}[1]$-hard when parameterized by $k$ for a large family of graphs that includes trees. We accompany these negative results with an $\textsf{XP}$ algorithm parameterized by $k$ and the treewidth of the graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Polynomial Kernel for Line Graph Deletion

The line graph of a graph $G$ is the graph $L(G)$ whose vertex set is the edge set of $G$ and there is an edge between $e,f\in E(G)$ if $e$ and $f$ share an endpoint in $G$. A graph is called line graph if it is a line graph of some graph. We study the Line-Graph-Edge Deletion problem, which asks whether we can delete at most $k$ edges from the input graph $G$ such that the resulting graph is a line graph. More precisely, we give a polynomial kernel for Line-Graph-Edge Deletion with $\mathcal{O}(k^{5})$ vertices. This answers an open question posed by Falk Hüffner at Workshop on Kernels (WorKer) in 2013.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extending Nearly Complete 1-Planar Drawings in Polynomial Time

The problem of extending partial geometric graph representations such as plane graphs has received considerable attention in recent years. In particular, given a graph $G$, a connected subgraph $H$ of $G$ and a drawing $\mathcal{H}$ of $H$, the extension problem asks whether $\mathcal{H}$ can be extended into a drawing of $G$ while maintaining some desired property of the drawing (e.g., planarity). In their breakthrough result, Angelini et al. [ACM TALG 2015] showed that the extension problem is polynomial-time solvable when the aim is to preserve planarity. Very recently we considered this problem for partial 1-planar drawings [ICALP 2020], which are drawings in the plane that allow each edge to have at most one crossing. The most important question identified and left open in that work is whether the problem can be solved in polynomial time when $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by deleting a bounded number of vertices and edges. In this work, we answer this question positively by providing a constructive polynomial-time decision algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extending Partial 1-Planar Drawings

Algorithmic extension problems of partial graph representations such as planar graph drawings or geometric intersection representations are of growing interest in topological graph theory and graph drawing. In such an extension problem, we are given a tuple $(G,H,\mathcal{H})$ consisting of a graph $G$, a connected subgraph $H$ of $G$ and a drawing $\mathcal{H}$ of $H$, and the task is to extend $\mathcal{H}$ into a drawing of $G$ while maintaining some desired property of the drawing, such as planarity. In this paper we study the problem of extending partial 1-planar drawings, which are drawings in the plane that allow each edge to have at most one crossing. In addition we consider the subclass of IC-planar drawings, which are 1-planar drawings with independent crossings. Recognizing 1-planar graphs as well as IC-planar graphs is \NP-complete and the \NP-completeness easily carries over to the extension problem. Therefore, our focus lies on establishing the tractability of such extension problems in a weaker sense than polynomial-time tractability. Here, we show that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of edges missing from $H$, i.e., the edge deletion distance between $H$ and $G$. The second part of the paper then turns to a more powerful parameterization which is based on measuring the vertex+edge deletion distance between the partial and complete drawing, i.e., the minimum number of vertices and edges that need to be deleted to obtain $H$ from $G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Manipulating Districts to Win Elections: Fine-Grained Complexity

Gerrymandering is a practice of manipulating district boundaries and locations in order to achieve a political advantage for a particular party. Lewenberg, Lev, and Rosenschein [AAMAS 2017] initiated the algorithmic study of a geographically-based manipulation problem, where voters must vote at the ballot box closest to them. In this variant of gerrymandering, for a given set of possible locations of ballot boxes and known political preferences of $n$ voters, the task is to identify locations for $k$ boxes out of $m$ possible locations to guarantee victory of a certain party in at least $l$ districts. Here integers $k$ and $l$ are some selected parameter. It is known that the problem is NP-complete already for 4 political parties and prior to our work only heuristic algorithms for this problem were developed. We initiate the rigorous study of the gerrymandering problem from the perspectives of parameterized and fine-grained complexity and provide asymptotically matching lower and upper bounds on its computational complexity. We prove that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k+n$ and that it does not admit an $f(n,k)\cdot m^{o(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for any function $f$ of $k$ and $n$ only, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our lower bounds hold already for $2$ parties. On the other hand, we give an algorithm that solves the problem for a constant number of parties in time $(m+n)^{O(\sqrt{k})}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Removing Connected Obstacles in the Plane is FPT

Given two points in the plane, a set of obstacles defined by closed curves, and an integer $k$, does there exist a path between the two designated points intersecting at most $k$ of the obstacles? This is a fundamental and well-studied problem arising naturally in computational geometry, graph theory, wireless computing, and motion planning. It remains $\textsf{NP}$-hard even when the obstacles are very simple geometric shapes (e.g., unit-length line segments). In this paper, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable ($\textsf{FPT}$) parameterized by $k$, by giving an algorithm with running time $k^{O(k^3)}n^{O(1)}$. Here $n$ is the number connected areas in the plane drawing of all the obstacles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Solving Integer Linear Programs with a Small Number of Global Variables and Constraints

Integer Linear Programming (ILP) has a broad range of applications in various areas of artificial intelligence. Yet in spite of recent advances, we still lack a thorough understanding of which structural restrictions make ILP tractable. Here we study ILP instances consisting of a small number of "global" variables and/or constraints such that the remaining part of the instance consists of small and otherwise independent components; this is captured in terms of a structural measure we call fracture backdoors which generalizes, for instance, the well-studied class of N -fold ILP instances. Our main contributions can be divided into three parts. First, we formally develop fracture backdoors and obtain exact and approximation algorithms for computing these. Second, we exploit these backdoors to develop several new parameterized algorithms for ILP; the performance of these algorithms will naturally scale based on the number of global variables or constraints in the instance. Finally, we complement the developed algorithms with matching lower bounds. Altogether, our results paint a near-complete complexity landscape of ILP with respect to fracture backdoors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access