BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Eric Blais

Eric Blais appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsquant-phDatabasesmath.COMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Randomised Composition and Small-Bias Minimax

We prove two results about randomised query complexity $\mathrm{R}(f)$. First, we introduce a "linearised" complexity measure $\mathrm{LR}$ and show that it satisfies an inner-optimal composition theorem: $\mathrm{R}(f\circ g) \geq Ω(\mathrm{R}(f) \mathrm{LR}(g))$ for all partial $f$ and $g$, and moreover, $\mathrm{LR}$ is the largest possible measure with this property. In particular, $\mathrm{LR}$ can be polynomially larger than previous measures that satisfy an inner composition theorem, such as the max-conflict complexity of Gavinsky, Lee, Santha, and Sanyal (ICALP 2019). Our second result addresses a question of Yao (FOCS 1977). He asked if $ε$-error expected query complexity $\bar{\mathrm{R}}_ε(f)$ admits a distributional characterisation relative to some hard input distribution. Vereshchagin (TCS 1998) answered this question affirmatively in the bounded-error case. We show that an analogous theorem fails in the small-bias case $ε=1/2-o(1)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Box Covers and Domain Orderings for Beyond Worst-Case Join Processing

Recent beyond worst-case optimal join algorithms Minesweeper and its generalization Tetris have brought the theory of indexing and join processing together by developing a geometric framework for joins. These algorithms take as input an index $\mathcal{B}$, referred to as a box cover, that stores output gaps that can be inferred from traditional indexes, such as B+ trees or tries, on the input relations. The performances of these algorithms highly depend on the certificate of $\mathcal{B}$, which is the smallest subset of gaps in $\mathcal{B}$ whose union covers all of the gaps in the output space of a query $Q$. We study how to generate box covers that contain small size certificates to guarantee efficient runtimes for these algorithms. First, given a query $Q$ over a set of relations of size $N$ and a fixed set of domain orderings for the attributes, we give a $\tilde{O}(N)$-time algorithm called GAMB which generates a box cover for $Q$ that is guaranteed to contain the smallest size certificate across any box cover for $Q$. Second, we show that finding a domain ordering to minimize the box cover size and certificate is NP-hard through a reduction from the 2 consecutive block minimization problem on boolean matrices. Our third contribution is a $\tilde{O}(N)$-time approximation algorithm called ADORA to compute domain orderings, under which one can compute a box cover of size $\tilde{O}(K^r)$, where $K$ is the minimum box cover for $Q$ under any domain ordering and $r$ is the maximum arity of any relation. This guarantees certificates of size $\tilde{O}(K^r)$. We combine ADORA and GAMB with Tetris to form a new algorithm we call TetrisReordered, which provides several new beyond worst-case bounds. On infinite families of queries, TetrisReordered's runtimes are unboundedly better than the bounds stated in prior work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A New Minimax Theorem for Randomized Algorithms

The celebrated minimax principle of Yao (1977) says that for any Boolean-valued function $f$ with finite domain, there is a distribution $μ$ over the domain of $f$ such that computing $f$ to error $ε$ against inputs from $μ$ is just as hard as computing $f$ to error $ε$ on worst-case inputs. Notably, however, the distribution $μ$ depends on the target error level $ε$: the hard distribution which is tight for bounded error might be trivial to solve to small bias, and the hard distribution which is tight for a small bias level might be far from tight for bounded error levels. In this work, we introduce a new type of minimax theorem which can provide a hard distribution $μ$ that works for all bias levels at once. We show that this works for randomized query complexity, randomized communication complexity, some randomized circuit models, quantum query and communication complexities, approximate polynomial degree, and approximate logrank. We also prove an improved version of Impagliazzo's hardcore lemma. Our proofs rely on two innovations over the classical approach of using Von Neumann's minimax theorem or linear programming duality. First, we use Sion's minimax theorem to prove a minimax theorem for ratios of bilinear functions representing the cost and score of algorithms. Second, we introduce a new way to analyze low-bias randomized algorithms by viewing them as "forecasting algorithms" evaluated by a proper scoring rule. The expected score of the forecasting version of a randomized algorithm appears to be a more fine-grained way of analyzing the bias of the algorithm. We show that such expected scores have many elegant mathematical properties: for example, they can be amplified linearly instead of quadratically. We anticipate forecasting algorithms will find use in future work in which a fine-grained analysis of small-bias algorithms is required.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A Characterization of Constant-Sample Testable Properties

We characterize the set of properties of Boolean-valued functions on a finite domain $\mathcal{X}$ that are testable with a constant number of samples. Specifically, we show that a property $\mathcal{P}$ is testable with a constant number of samples if and only if it is (essentially) a $k$-part symmetric property for some constant $k$, where a property is {\em $k$-part symmetric} if there is a partition $S_1,\ldots,S_k$ of $\mathcal{X}$ such that whether $f:\mathcal{X} \to \{0,1\}$ satisfies the property is determined solely by the densities of $f$ on $S_1,\ldots,S_k$. We use this characterization to obtain a number of corollaries, namely: (i) A graph property $\mathcal{P}$ is testable with a constant number of samples if and only if whether a graph $G$ satisfies $\mathcal{P}$ is (essentially) determined by the edge density of $G$. (ii) An affine-invariant property $\mathcal{P}$ of functions $f:\mathbb{F}_p^n \to \{0,1\}$ is testable with a constant number of samples if and only if whether $f$ satisfies $\mathcal{P}$ is (essentially) determined by the density of $f$. (iii) For every constant $d \geq 1$, monotonicity of functions $f : [n]^d \to \{0, 1\}$ on the $d$-dimensional hypergrid is testable with a constant number of samples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Testing submodularity and other properties of valuation functions

We show that for any constant $ε> 0$ and $p \ge 1$, it is possible to distinguish functions $f : \{0,1\}^n \to [0,1]$ that are submodular from those that are $ε$-far from every submodular function in $\ell_p$ distance with a constant number of queries. More generally, we extend the testing-by-implicit-learning framework of Diakonikolas et al. (2007) to show that every property of real-valued functions that is well-approximated in $\ell_2$ distance by a class of $k$-juntas for some $k = O(1)$ can be tested in the $\ell_p$-testing model with a constant number of queries. This result, combined with a recent junta theorem of Feldman and Vondrak (2016), yields the constant-query testability of submodularity. It also yields constant-query testing algorithms for a variety of other natural properties of valuation functions, including fractionally additive (XOS) functions, OXS functions, unit demand functions, coverage functions, and self-bounding functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Tolerant Junta Testing and the Connection to Submodular Optimization and Function Isomorphism

A function $f\colon \{-1,1\}^n \to \{-1,1\}$ is a $k$-junta if it depends on at most $k$ of its variables. We consider the problem of tolerant testing of $k$-juntas, where the testing algorithm must accept any function that is $ε$-close to some $k$-junta and reject any function that is $ε'$-far from every $k'$-junta for some $ε'= O(ε)$ and $k' = O(k)$. Our first result is an algorithm that solves this problem with query complexity polynomial in $k$ and $1/ε$. This result is obtained via a new polynomial-time approximation algorithm for submodular function minimization (SFM) under large cardinality constraints, which holds even when only given an approximate oracle access to the function. Our second result considers the case where $k'=k$. We show how to obtain a smooth tradeoff between the amount of tolerance and the query complexity in this setting. Specifically, we design an algorithm that given $ρ\in(0,1/2)$ accepts any function that is $\frac{ερ}{16}$-close to some $k$-junta and rejects any function that is $ε$-far from every $k$-junta. The query complexity of the algorithm is $O\big( \frac{k\log k}{ερ(1-ρ)^k} \big)$. Finally, we show how to apply the second result to the problem of tolerant isomorphism testing between two unknown Boolean functions $f$ and $g$. We give an algorithm for this problem whose query complexity only depends on the (unknown) smallest $k$ such that either $f$ or $g$ is close to being a $k$-junta.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Polynomial Lower Bound for Testing Monotonicity

We show that every algorithm for testing $n$-variate Boolean functions for monotonicity must have query complexity $\tildeΩ(n^{1/4})$. All previous lower bounds for this problem were designed for non-adaptive algorithms and, as a result, the best previous lower bound for general (possibly adaptive) monotonicity testers was only $Ω(\log n)$. Combined with the query complexity of the non-adaptive monotonicity tester of Khot, Minzer, and Safra (FOCS 2015), our lower bound shows that adaptivity can result in at most a quadratic reduction in the query complexity for testing monotonicity. By contrast, we show that there is an exponential gap between the query complexity of adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms for testing regular linear threshold functions (LTFs) for monotonicity. Chen, De, Servedio, and Tan (STOC 2015) recently showed that non-adaptive algorithms require almost $Ω(n^{1/2})$ queries for this task. We introduce a new adaptive monotonicity testing algorithm which has query complexity $O(\log n)$ when the input is a regular LTF.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Quantum Algorithm for Monotonicity Testing on the Hypercube

In this note, we develop a bounded-error quantum algorithm that makes $\tilde O(n^{1/4}\varepsilon^{-1/2})$ queries to a Boolean function $f$, accepts a monotone function, and rejects a function that is $\varepsilon$-far from being monotone. This gives a super-quadratic improvement compared to the best known randomized algorithm for all $\varepsilon = o(1)$. The improvement is cubic when $\varepsilon = 1/\sqrt{n}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Learning circuits with few negations

Monotone Boolean functions, and the monotone Boolean circuits that compute them, have been intensively studied in complexity theory. In this paper we study the structure of Boolean functions in terms of the minimum number of negations in any circuit computing them, a complexity measure that interpolates between monotone functions and the class of all functions. We study this generalization of monotonicity from the vantage point of learning theory, giving near-matching upper and lower bounds on the uniform-distribution learnability of circuits in terms of the number of negations they contain. Our upper bounds are based on a new structural characterization of negation-limited circuits that extends a classical result of A. A. Markov. Our lower bounds, which employ Fourier-analytic tools from hardness amplification, give new results even for circuits with no negations (i.e. monotone functions).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Rapid Sampling for Visualizations with Ordering Guarantees

Visualizations are frequently used as a means to understand trends and gather insights from datasets, but often take a long time to generate. In this paper, we focus on the problem of rapidly generating approximate visualizations while preserving crucial visual proper- ties of interest to analysts. Our primary focus will be on sampling algorithms that preserve the visual property of ordering; our techniques will also apply to some other visual properties. For instance, our algorithms can be used to generate an approximate visualization of a bar chart very rapidly, where the comparisons between any two bars are correct. We formally show that our sampling algorithms are generally applicable and provably optimal in theory, in that they do not take more samples than necessary to generate the visualizations with ordering guarantees. They also work well in practice, correctly ordering output groups while taking orders of magnitude fewer samples and much less time than conventional sampling schemes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Active Property Testing

One of the motivations for property testing of boolean functions is the idea that testing can serve as a preprocessing step before learning. However, in most machine learning applications, it is not possible to request for labels of fictitious examples constructed by the algorithm. Instead, the dominant query paradigm in applied machine learning, called active learning, is one where the algorithm may query for labels, but only on points in a given polynomial-sized (unlabeled) sample, drawn from some underlying distribution D. In this work, we bring this well-studied model in learning to the domain of testing. We show that for a number of important properties, testing can still yield substantial benefits in this setting. This includes testing unions of intervals, testing linear separators, and testing various assumptions used in semi-supervised learning. In addition to these specific results, we also develop a general notion of the testing dimension of a given property with respect to a given distribution. We show this dimension characterizes (up to constant factors) the intrinsic number of label requests needed to test that property. We develop such notions for both the active and passive testing models. We then use these dimensions to prove a number of lower bounds, including for linear separators and the class of dictator functions. Our results show that testing can be a powerful tool in realistic models for learning, and further that active testing exhibits an interesting and rich structure. Our work in addition brings together tools from a range of areas including U-statistics, noise-sensitivity, self-correction, and spectral analysis of random matrices, and develops new tools that may be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Semi-Strong Coloring of Intersecting Hypergraphs

For any c >= 2, a c-strong coloring of the hypergraph G is an assignment of colors to the vertices of G such that for every edge e of G, the vertices of e are colored by at least min{c,|e|} distinct colors. The hypergraph G is t-intersecting if every two edges of G have at least t vertices in common. We ask: for fixed c >= 2 and t >= 1, what is the minimum number of colors that is sufficient to c-strong color any t-intersecting hypergraphs? The purpose of this note is to answer the question for some values of t and c and, more importantly, to describe the settings for which the question is still open. We show that when t <= c-2, no finite number of colors is sufficient to c-strong color all t-intersecting hypergraphs. It is still unknown whether a finite number of colors suffices for the same task when t = c-1 and c > 2. In the last case, when t >= c, we show with a probabilistic argument that a finite number of colors is sufficient to c-strong color all t-intersecting hypergraphs, but a large gap still remains between the best upper and lower bounds on this number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Partially Symmetric Functions are Efficiently Isomorphism-Testable

Given a function f: {0,1}^n \to {0,1}, the f-isomorphism testing problem requires a randomized algorithm to distinguish functions that are identical to f up to relabeling of the input variables from functions that are far from being so. An important open question in property testing is to determine for which functions f we can test f-isomorphism with a constant number of queries. Despite much recent attention to this question, essentially only two classes of functions were known to be efficiently isomorphism testable: symmetric functions and juntas. We unify and extend these results by showing that all partially symmetric functions---functions invariant to the reordering of all but a constant number of their variables---are efficiently isomorphism-testable. This class of functions, first introduced by Shannon, includes symmetric functions, juntas, and many other functions as well. We conjecture that these functions are essentially the only functions efficiently isomorphism-testable. To prove our main result, we also show that partial symmetry is efficiently testable. In turn, to prove this result we had to revisit the junta testing problem. We provide a new proof of correctness of the nearly-optimal junta tester. Our new proof replaces the Fourier machinery of the original proof with a purely combinatorial argument that exploits the connection between sets of variables with low influence and intersecting families. Another important ingredient in our proofs is a new notion of symmetric influence. We use this measure of influence to prove that partial symmetry is efficiently testable and also to construct an efficient sample extractor for partially symmetric functions. We then combine the sample extractor with the testing-by-implicit-learning approach to complete the proof that partially symmetric functions are efficiently isomorphism-testable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access