BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Enoch Peserico appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We present a simple proof that the competitive ratio of any randomized online matching algorithm for the line is at least $\sqrt{\log_2(n\!+\!1)}/12$ for all $n=2^i\!-\!1: i\in\mathbb{N}$.
This is the first work investigating community structure and interaction dynamics through the lens of quotes in online discussion forums. We examine four forums of different size, language, and topic. Quote usage, which is surprisingly consistent over time and users, appears to have an important role in aiding intra-thread navigation, and uncovers a hidden "social" structure in communities otherwise lacking all trappings (from friends and followers to reputations) of today's social networks.
How large a fraction of a graph must one explore to rank a small set of nodes according to their PageRank scores? We show that the answer is quite nuanced, and depends crucially on the interplay between the correctness guarantees one requires and the way one can access the graph. On the one hand, assuming the graph can be accessed only via "natural" exploration queries that reveal small pieces of its topology, we prove that deterministic and Las Vegas algorithms must in the worst case perform $n - o(n)$ queries and explore essentially the entire graph, independently of the specific types of query employed. On the other hand we show that, depending on the types of query available, Monte Carlo algorithms can perform asymptotically better: if allowed to both explore the local topology around single nodes and access nodes at random in the graph they need $Ω(n^{2/3})$ queries in the worst case, otherwise they still need $Ω(n)$ queries similarly to Las Vegas algorithms. All our bounds generalize and tighten those already known, cover the different types of graph exploration queries appearing in the literature, and immediately apply also to the problem of approximating the PageRank score of single nodes.
We study a generalization of the classic paging problem that allows the amount of available memory to vary over time - capturing a fundamental property of many modern computing realities, from cloud computing to multi-core and energy-optimized processors. It turns out that good performance in the "classic" case provides no performance guarantees when memory capacity fluctuates: roughly speaking, moving from static to dynamic capacity can mean the difference between optimality within a factor 2 in space and time, and suboptimality by an arbitrarily large factor. More precisely, adopting the competitive analysis framework, we show that some online paging algorithms, despite having an optimal (h,k)-competitive ratio when capacity remains constant, are not (3,k)-competitive for any arbitrarily large k in the presence of minimal capacity fluctuations. In this light it is surprising that several classic paging algorithms perform remarkably well even if memory capacity changes adversarially - even without taking those changes into explicit account! In particular, we prove that LFD still achieves the minimum number of faults, and that several classic online algorithms such as LRU have a "dynamic" (h,k)-competitive ratio that is the best one can achieve without knowledge of future page requests, even if one had perfect knowledge of future capacity fluctuations (an exact characterization of this ratio shows it is almost, albeit not quite, equal to the "classic" ratio k/(k-h+1)). In other words, with careful management, knowing/predicting future memory resources appears far less crucial to performance than knowing/predicting future data accesses.