Researcher profile

Emmanuel Monfrini

Emmanuel Monfrini contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Deriving discriminative classifiers from generative models

We deal with Bayesian generative and discriminative classifiers. Given a model distribution $p(x, y)$, with the observation $y$ and the target $x$, one computes generative classifiers by firstly considering $p(x, y)$ and then using the Bayes rule to calculate $p(x | y)$. A discriminative model is directly given by $p(x | y)$, which is used to compute discriminative classifiers. However, recent works showed that the Bayesian Maximum Posterior classifier defined from the Naive Bayes (NB) or Hidden Markov Chain (HMC), both generative models, can also match the discriminative classifier definition. Thus, there are situations in which dividing classifiers into "generative" and "discriminative" is somewhat misleading. Indeed, such a distinction is rather related to the way of computing classifiers, not to the classifiers themselves. We present a general theoretical result specifying how a generative classifier induced from a generative model can also be computed in a discriminative way from the same model. Examples of NB and HMC are found again as particular cases, and we apply the general result to two original extensions of NB, and two extensions of HMC, one of which being original. Finally, we shortly illustrate the interest of the new discriminative way of computing classifiers in the Natural Language Processing (NLP) framework.

preprint2021arXiv

Introducing the Hidden Neural Markov Chain framework

Nowadays, neural network models achieve state-of-the-art results in many areas as computer vision or speech processing. For sequential data, especially for Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and their extensions, the Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network and the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), are among the most used models, having a "term-to-term" sequence processing. However, if many works create extensions and improvements of the RNN, few have focused on developing other ways for sequential data processing with neural networks in a "term-to-term" way. This paper proposes the original Hidden Neural Markov Chain (HNMC) framework, a new family of sequential neural models. They are not based on the RNN but on the Hidden Markov Model (HMM), a probabilistic graphical model. This neural extension is possible thanks to the recent Entropic Forward-Backward algorithm for HMM restoration. We propose three different models: the classic HNMC, the HNMC2, and the HNMC-CN. After describing our models' whole construction, we compare them with classic RNN and Bidirectional RNN (BiRNN) models for some sequence labeling tasks: Chunking, Part-Of-Speech Tagging, and Named Entity Recognition. For every experiment, whatever the architecture or the embedding method used, one of our proposed models has the best results. It shows this new neural sequential framework's potential, which can open the way to new models, and might eventually compete with the prevalent BiLSTM and BiGRU.

preprint2021arXiv

Using the Naive Bayes as a discriminative classifier

For classification tasks, probabilistic models can be categorized into two disjoint classes: generative or discriminative. It depends on the posterior probability computation of the label $x$ given the observation $y$, $p(x | y)$. On the one hand, generative classifiers, like the Naive Bayes or the Hidden Markov Model (HMM), need the computation of the joint probability p(x,y), before using the Bayes rule to compute $p(x | y)$. On the other hand, discriminative classifiers compute $p(x | y)$ directly, regardless of the observations' law. They are intensively used nowadays, with models as Logistic Regression, Conditional Random Fields (CRF), and Artificial Neural Networks. However, the recent Entropic Forward-Backward algorithm shows that the HMM, considered as a generative model, can also match the discriminative one's definition. This example leads to question if it is the case for other generative models. In this paper, we show that the Naive Bayes classifier can also match the discriminative classifier definition, so it can be used in either a generative or a discriminative way. Moreover, this observation also discusses the notion of Generative-Discriminative pairs, linking, for example, Naive Bayes and Logistic Regression, or HMM and CRF. Related to this point, we show that the Logistic Regression can be viewed as a particular case of the Naive Bayes used in a discriminative way.

preprint2020arXiv

Hidden Markov Chains, Entropic Forward-Backward, and Part-Of-Speech Tagging

The ability to take into account the characteristics - also called features - of observations is essential in Natural Language Processing (NLP) problems. Hidden Markov Chain (HMC) model associated with classic Forward-Backward probabilities cannot handle arbitrary features like prefixes or suffixes of any size, except with an independence condition. For twenty years, this default has encouraged the development of other sequential models, starting with the Maximum Entropy Markov Model (MEMM), which elegantly integrates arbitrary features. More generally, it led to neglect HMC for NLP. In this paper, we show that the problem is not due to HMC itself, but to the way its restoration algorithms are computed. We present a new way of computing HMC based restorations using original Entropic Forward and Entropic Backward (EFB) probabilities. Our method allows taking into account features in the HMC framework in the same way as in the MEMM framework. We illustrate the efficiency of HMC using EFB in Part-Of-Speech Tagging, showing its superiority over MEMM based restoration. We also specify, as a perspective, how HMCs with EFB might appear as an alternative to Recurrent Neural Networks to treat sequential data with a deep architecture.