BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Emilio De Santis

Emilio De Santis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.PRmath-phmath.COmath.MPmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Existence and construction of voting situations concordant with ranking patterns

Referring to a standard context of voting theory, and to the classic notion of voting situation, here we show that it is possible to observe any arbitrary set of elections' outcomes, no matter how paradoxical it may appear. On this purpose we use results, presented in a recent paper of us, that hinge on the concept of ranking pattern concordant with a probability model for non-negative random variables and on a related role of special load-sharing models. Our results here will be obtained by suitably extending those therein, and by converting them into the context of voting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stochastic precedence and minima among dependent variables

The notion of stochastic precedence between two random variables emerges as a relevant concept in several fields of applied probability. When one consider a vector of random variables $X_1,...,X_n$, this notion has a preeminent role in the analysis of minima of the type $\min_{j \in A} X_j$ for $A \subset \{1, \ldots n\}$. In such an analysis, however, several apparently controversial aspects can arise (among which phenomena of "non-transitivity"). Here we concentrate attention on vectors of non-negative random variables with absolutely continuous joint distributions, in which a case the set of the multivariate conditional hazard rate (m.c.h.r.) functions can be employed as a convenient method to describe different aspects of stochastic dependence. In terms of the m.c.h.r. functions, we first obtain convenient formulas for the probability distributions of the variables $\min_{j \in A} X_j$ and for the probability of events $\{X_i=\min_{j \in A} X_j\}$. Then we detail several aspects of the notion of stochastic precedence. On these bases, we explain some controversial behavior of such variables and give sufficient conditions under which paradoxical aspects can be excluded. On the purpose of stimulating active interest of readers, we present several comments and pertinent examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A general framework for perfect simulation of long memory processes

In this paper a general approach for the perfect simulation of a stationary process with at most countable state space is outlined. The process is specified through a kernel, prescribing the probability of each state conditional to the whole past history. We follow the seminal paper of Comets, Fernandez and Ferrari, where sufficient conditions for the construction of a certain perfect simulation algorithm have been given. We generalize this approach by defining backward coalescence times for these kind of processes; this allows us to construct perfect simulation algorithms under weaker conditions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access