BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Elemer E Rosinger

Elemer E Rosinger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.GMphysics.gen-phmath.AP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
10works
0followers
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

Beyond Topologies, Part I

Arguments on the need, and usefulness, of going beyond the usual Hausdorff-Kuratowski-Bourbaki, or in short, HKB concept of topology are presented. The motivation comes, among others, from well known {\it topological type processes}, or in short TTP-s, in the theories of Measure, Integration and Ordered Spaces. These TTP-s, as shown by the classical characterization given by the {\it four Moore-Smith conditions}, can {\it no longer} be incorporated within the usual HKB topologies. One of the most successful recent ways to go beyond HKB topologies is that developed in Beattie & Butzmann. It is shown in this work how that extended concept of topology is a {\it particular} case of the earlier one suggested and used by the first author in the study of generalized solutions of large classes of nonlinear partial differential equations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Dynamics in the Category Set

What makes sets, or more precisely, the category {\bf Set} important in Mathematics are the well known {\it two} specific ways in which arbitrary mappings $f : X \longrightarrow Y$ between any two sets $X, Y$ can {\it fail} to be bijections. Namely, they can fail to be injective, and/or to be surjective. As for bijective mappings they are rather trivial, since with some relabeling of their domains or ranges, they simply become permutations, or even identity mappings. \\ To the above, one may add the {\it third} property of sets, namely that, between any two nonvoid sets there exist mappings. \\ These three properties turn out to be at the root of much of the interest which the category {\bf Set} has in Mathematics. Specifically, these properties create a certain {\it dynamics}, or for that matter, lack of it, on the level of the category {\bf Set} and of some of its subcategories.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Four Departures in Mathematics and Physics

Much of Mathematics, and therefore Physics as well, have been limited by four rather consequential restrictions. Two of them are ancient taboos, one is an ancient and no longer felt as such bondage, and the fourth is a surprising omission in Algebra. The paper brings to the attention of those interested these four restrictions, as well as the fact that each of them has by now ways, even if hardly yet known ones, to overcome them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Inevitable Infinite Branching in the Multiplication of Singularities

Singularities appear in numerous important mathematical models used in Physics. And in most of such cases singularities are involved in essentially nonlinear contexts. For more than four decades, general enough nonlinear theories of singularities have been developed. A critically important related feature is that, above certain levels in singularities, the operation of multiplication, and in general, nonlinear operations on such singularities do inevitably branch in infinitely many ways, without the possibility for the existence of some unique natural or canonical way such nonlinear operations may be performed. Consequently, the choice in such branchings has to come from extraneous considerations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Local Functions : Algebras, Ideals, and Reduced Power Algebras

A further significant extension is presented of the infinitely large class of differential algebras of generalized functions which are the basic structures in the nonlinear algebraic theory listed under 46F30 in the AMS Mathematical Subject Classification. These algebras are constructed as {\it reduced powers}, when seen in terms of Model Theory. The major advantage of these differential algebras of generalized functions is that they allow their elements to have singularities on {\it dense} subsets of their domain of definition, and {\it without} any restrictions on the respective generalized functions in the neighbourhood of their singularities. Their applications have so far been in 1) solving large classes of systems of nonlinear PDEs, 2) highly singular problems in Differential Geometry, with respective applications in modern Physics, including General Relativity and Quantum Gravity. These infinite classes of algebras contain as a particular case the Colombeau algebras, since in the latter algebras rather strongly limiting growth conditions, namely, of polynomial type, are required on the generalized functions in the neighbourhood of their singularities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Special Relativity in Reduced Power Algebras

Recently, [10,11], the Heisenberg Uncertainty relation and the No-Cloning property in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Computation, respectively, have been extended to versions of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Computation which are re-formulated using scalars in {\it reduced power algebras}, [2-9], instead of the usual real or complex scalars. Here, the Lorentz coordinate transformations, fundamental in Special Relativity, are extended to versions of Special Relativity that are similarly re-formulated in terms of scalars in reduced power algebras, instead of the usual real or complex scalars. The interest in such re-formulations of basic theories of Physics are due to a number of important reasons, [2-11]. Suffice to mention two of them : the difficult problem of so called "infinities in Physics" falls easily aside due to the presence of infinitesimal and infinitely large scalars in such reduced power algebras, and the issue of fundamental constants in physics, like Planck's $h$, or the velocity of light $c$, comes under a new focus which offers rather surprising alternatives.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

Where and how does it happen ?

It has for ages been a rather constant feature of thinking in science to take it for granted that the respective thinking happens in realms which are totally outside and independent of all the other phenomena that constitute the objects of such thinking. The imposition of this divide on two levels may conflict with basic assumptions of Newtonian and Einsteinian mechanics, as well as with those in Quantum Mechanics. It also raises the question whether the realms in which thinking happens have no any other connection with the realms science deals with, except to host and allow scientific thinking.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access