BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Edwin R. van den Heuvel

Edwin R. van den Heuvel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplicationsmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Kendall's tau estimator for bivariate zero-inflated count data

In this paper, we extend the work of Pimentel et al. (2015) and propose an adjusted estimator of Kendall's $τ$ for bivariate zero-inflated count data. We provide achievable lower and upper bounds of our proposed estimator and show its relationship with current literature. In addition, we also suggest an estimator of the achievable bounds, thereby helping practitioners interpret the results while working with real data. The performance of the proposed estimator for Kendall's $τ$ is unbiased with smaller mean squared errors compared to the unadjusted estimator of Pimentel et al. (2015). Our results also show that the bound estimator can be used when knowledge of the marginal distributions is lacking.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Simulation Models for Aggregated Data Meta-Analysis: Evaluation of Pooling Effect Sizes and Publication Biases

Simulation studies are commonly used to evaluate the performance of newly developed meta-analysis methods. For methodology that is developed for an aggregated data meta-analysis, researchers often resort to simulation of the aggregated data directly, instead of simulating individual participant data from which the aggregated data would be calculated in reality. Clearly, distributional characteristics of the aggregated data statistics may be derived from distributional assumptions of the underlying individual data, but they are often not made explicit in publications. This paper provides the distribution of the aggregated data statistics that were derived from a heteroscedastic mixed effects model for continuous individual data. As a result, we provide a procedure for directly simulating the aggregated data statistics. We also compare our distributional findings with other simulation approaches of aggregated data used in literature by describing their theoretical differences and by conducting a simulation study for three meta-analysis methods: DerSimonian and Laird's pooled estimate and the Trim & Fill and PET-PEESE method for adjustment of publication bias. We demonstrate that the choices of simulation model for aggregated data may have a relevant impact on (the conclusions of) the performance of the meta-analysis method. We recommend the use of multiple aggregated data simulation models for investigation of new methodology to determine sensitivity or otherwise make the individual participant data model explicit that would lead to the distributional choices of the aggregated data statistics used in the simulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Copas' method is sensitive to different mechanisms of publication bias

Copas' method corrects a pooled estimate from an aggregated data meta-analysis for publication bias. Its performance has been studied for one particular mechanism of publication bias. We show through simulations that Copas' method is not robust against other realistic mechanisms. This questions the usefulness of Copas' method, since publication bias mechanisms are typically unknown in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Random autoregressive models: A structured overview

Models characterized by autoregressive structure and random coefficients are powerful tools for the analysis of high-frequency, high-dimensional and volatile time series. The available literature on such models is broad, but also sectorial, overlapping, and confusing. Most models focus on one property of the data, while much can be gained by combining the strength of various models and their sources of heterogeneity. We present a structured overview of the literature on autoregressive models with random coefficients. We describe hierarchy and analogies among models, and for each we systematically list properties, estimation methods, tests, software packages and typical applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access