BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dongjin Choi

Dongjin Choi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and LanguageHuman-Computer InteractionMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceDatabases

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Putting Humans in the Natural Language Processing Loop: A Survey

How can we design Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems that learn from human feedback? There is a growing research body of Human-in-the-loop (HITL) NLP frameworks that continuously integrate human feedback to improve the model itself. HITL NLP research is nascent but multifarious -- solving various NLP problems, collecting diverse feedback from different people, and applying different methods to learn from collected feedback. We present a survey of HITL NLP work from both Machine Learning (ML) and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) communities that highlights its short yet inspiring history, and thoroughly summarize recent frameworks focusing on their tasks, goals, human interactions, and feedback learning methods. Finally, we discuss future directions for integrating human feedback in the NLP development loop.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Data Programming by Demonstration: A Framework for Interactively Learning Labeling Functions

Data programming is a programmatic weak supervision approach to efficiently curate large-scale labeled training data. Writing data programs (labeling functions) requires, however, both programming literacy and domain expertise. Many subject matter experts have neither programming proficiency nor time to effectively write data programs. Furthermore, regardless of one's expertise in coding or machine learning, transferring domain expertise into labeling functions by enumerating rules and thresholds is not only time consuming but also inherently difficult. Here we propose a new framework, data programming by demonstration (DPBD), to generate labeling rules using interactive demonstrations of users. DPBD aims to relieve the burden of writing labeling functions from users, enabling them to focus on higher-level semantics such as identifying relevant signals for labeling tasks. We operationalize our framework with Ruler, an interactive system that synthesizes labeling rules for document classification by using span-level annotations of users on document examples. We compare Ruler with conventional data programming through a user study conducted with 10 data scientists creating labeling functions for sentiment and spam classification tasks. We find that Ruler is easier to use and learn and offers higher overall satisfaction, while providing discriminative model performances comparable to ones achieved by conventional data programming.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access