Source author record

Dima Sinapova

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2026arXiv

Forcing, genericity and CBERS

In this paper we continue the study of equivalence of generics filters started by Smythe in [Smy22]. We fully characterize those forcing posets for which the corresponding equivalence of generics is smooth using the purely topological property of condensation. Next we leverage our characterization to show that there are non-homogeneous forcing for which equivalence of generics is not smooth. Then we prove hyperfiniteness in the case of Prikry forcing and some additional results addressing the problem whether generic equivalence for Cohen forcing is hyperfinite.

preprint2022arXiv

Sigma-Prikry forcing II: Iteration Scheme

In Part I of this series, we introduced a class of notions of forcing which we call Sigma-Prikry, and showed that many of the known Prikry-type notions of forcing that center around singular cardinals of countable cofinality are Sigma-Prikry. We showed that given a Sigma-Prikry poset P and a P-name for a non-reflecting stationary set T, there exists a corresponding Sigma-Prikry poset that projects to P and kills the stationarity of T. In this paper, we develop a general scheme for iterating Sigma-Prikry posets and, as an application, we blow up the power of a countable limit of Laver-indestructible supercompact cardinals, and then iteratively kill all non-reflecting stationary subsets of its successor. This yields a model in which the singular cardinal hypothesis fails and simultaneous reflection of finite families of stationary sets holds.

preprint2020arXiv

Kurepa trees and spectra of Lω1,ω\mathcal{L}_{ω_1,ω}-sentences

We use set-theoretic tools to make a model-theoretic contribution. In particular, we construct a \emph{single} Lω1,ω\mathcal{L}_{ω_1,ω}-sentence ψψ that codes Kurepa trees to prove the consistency of the following: (1) The spectrum of ψψ is consistently equal to [ℵ0,ℵω1][\aleph_0,\aleph_{ω_1}] and also consistently equal to [ℵ0,2ℵ1)[\aleph_0,2^{\aleph_1}), where 2ℵ12^{\aleph_1} is weakly inaccessible. (2) The amalgamation spectrum of ψψ is consistently equal to [ℵ1,ℵω1][\aleph_1,\aleph_{ω_1}] and [ℵ1,2ℵ1)[\aleph_1,2^{\aleph_1}), where again 2ℵ12^{\aleph_1} is weakly inaccessible. This is the first example of an Lω1,ω\mathcal{L}_{ω_1,ω}-sentence whose spectrum and amalgamation spectrum are consistently both right-open and right-closed. It also provides a positive answer to a question in [18]. (3) Consistently, ψψ has maximal models in finite, countable, and uncountable many cardinalities. This complements the examples given in [1] and [2] of sentences with maximal models in countably many cardinalities. (4) 2ℵ0<ℵω1<2ℵ12^{\aleph_0}<\aleph_{ω_1}<2^{\aleph_1} and there exists an Lω1,ω\mathcal{L}_{ω_1,ω}-sentence with models in ℵω1\aleph_{ω_1}, but no models in 2ℵ12^{\aleph_1}. This relates to a conjecture by Shelah that if ℵω1<2ℵ0\aleph_{ω_1}<2^{\aleph_0}, then any Lω1,ω\mathcal{L}_{ω_1,ω}-sentence with a model of size ℵω1\aleph_{ω_1} also has a model of size 2ℵ02^{\aleph_0}. Our result proves that 2ℵ02^{\aleph_0} can not be replaced by 2ℵ12^{\aleph_1}, even if 2ℵ0<ℵω12^{\aleph_0}<\aleph_{ω_1}.

preprint2020arXiv

Sigma-Prikry forcing I: The Axioms

We introduce a class of notions of forcing which we call ΣΣ-Prikry, and show that many of the known Prikry-type notions of forcing that centers around singular cardinals of countable cofinality are ΣΣ-Prikry. We show that given a ΣΣ-Prikry poset P\mathbb P and a name for a non-reflecting stationary set TT, there exists a corresponding ΣΣ-Prikry poset that projects to P\mathbb P and kills the stationarity of TT. Then, in a sequel to this paper, we develop an iteration scheme for ΣΣ-Prikry posets. Putting the two works together, we obtain a proof of the following. Theorem. If κκ is the limit of a countable increasing sequence of supercompact cardinals, then there exists a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which κκ remains a strong limit, every finite collection of stationary subsets of κ+κ^+ reflects simultaneously, and 2κ=κ++2^κ=κ^{++}.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.