BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dieter Gromes

Dieter Gromes contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-phphysics.class-phastro-ph.COgr-qchep-lathep-th

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
6topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Where the Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac equation for the radiation reaction force fails, and why the "proofs" break down

We calculate the energy radiated coherently by a system of $N$ charged non relativistic particles. It disagrees with the energy loss which is obtained if one employs the Lorentz Abraham Dirac (LAD) equation for each particle, and sums up the contributions. This fact was already clearly stated in the classical literature long ago. The reason for the discrepancy is the omission of the mixing terms in the Poynting vector. For some simple systems we present a generalized equation for the radiation reaction force which cures this defect. The counter examples show that the LAD equation cannot be generally valid and that all "proofs" must fail somewhere. We demonstrate this failure for some popular examples in the literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Novel and Unique Expression for the Radiation Reaction Force, Relevance of Newton's Third Law and Tunneling

We derive the radiation reaction by taking into account that the acceleration of the charge is caused by the interaction with some heavy source particle. In the non relativistic case this leads, in contrast to the usual approach, immediately to a result which is Galilei invariant. Simple examples show that there can be small regions of extremely low velocity where the energy requirements cannot be fulfilled, and which the charged particle can only cross by quantum mechanical tunneling. We also give the relativistic generalization which appears unique. The force is a four-vector, but only if the presence of the source is taken into account as well. It contains no third derivatives of the position as the Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac equation, and consequently no run away solutions. All examples considered so far give reasonable results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Optimal covariant fitting to a Robertson-Walker metric and smallness of backreaction

We define a class of "optimal" coordinate systems by requiring that the deviation from an exact Robertson-Walker metric is "as small as possible" within a given four dimensional volume. The optimization is performed by minimizing several volume integrals which would vanish for an exact Robertson-Walker metric. Covariance is automatic. Foliation of space-time is part of the optimization procedure. Only the metric is involved in the procedure, no assumptions about the origin of the energy-momentum tensor are needed. A scale factor does not show up during the optimization process, the optimal scale factor is determined at the end. The general formulation is non perturbative. An explicit perturbative treatment is possible. The shifts which lead to the optimal coordinates obey Euler-Lagrange equations which are formulated and solved in first order of the perturbation. The extension to second order is sketched, but turns out to be unnecessary. The only freedom in the choice of coordinates which finally remains are the rigid transformations which keep the form of the Robertson-Walker metric intact, i.e. translations in space and time, spatial rotations, and spatial scaling. Spatial averaging becomes trivial. In first order of the perturbation there is no backreaction. A simplified second order treatment results in a very small effect, excluding the possibility to mimic dark energy from backreaction. This confirms (as well as contradicts) statements in the literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Poincare' invariance constraints on NRQCD and potential NRQCD

We discuss the constraints induced by the algebra of the Poincare' generators on non-relativistic effective field theories. In the first part we derive some relations among the matching coefficients of the HQET (and NRQCD), which have been formerly obtained by use of reparametrization invariance. In the second part we obtain new constraints on the matching coefficients of pNRQCD.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2003arXiv

On the Glue Content in Heavy Quarkonia

Starting with two coupled Bethe-Salpeter equations for the quark-antiquark, and for the quark-glue-antiquark component of the quarkonium, we solve the bound state equations perturbatively. The resulting admixture of glue can be partially understood in a semiclassical way, one has, however, to take care of the different use of time ordered versus retarded Green functions. Subtle questions concerning the precise definition of the equal time wave function arise, because the wave function for the Coulomb gluon is discontinuous with respect to the relative time of the gluon. A striking feature is that a one loop non abelian graph contributes to the same order as tree graphs, because the couplings of transverse gluons in the tree graphs are suppressed in the non relativistic bound state, while the higher order loop graph can couple to quarks via non suppressed Coulomb gluons. We also calculate the amplitude for quark and antiquark at zero distance in the quark-glue-antiquark component of the P-state. This quantity is of importance for annihilation decays of P-states. It shows a remarkable compensation between the tree graph and the non abelian loop graph contribution. An extension of our results to include non perturbative effects is possible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2001arXiv

Poincare' invariance and the heavy-quark potential

We derive and discuss the constraints induced by Poincare' invariance on the form of the heavy-quark potential up to order 1/m^2. We present two derivations: one uses general arguments directly based on the Poincare' algebra and the other follows from an explicit calculation on the expression of the potential in terms of Wilson loops. We confirm relations from the literature, but also clarify the origin of a long-standing false statement pointed out recently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1999arXiv

Analytic approach to confinement and monopoles in lattice SU(2)

We extend the approach of Banks, Myerson, and Kogut for the calculation of the Wilson loop in lattice U(1) to the non-abelian SU(2) group. The original degrees of freedom of the theory are integrated out, new degrees of freedom are introduced in several steps. The centre group $Z_2$ enters automatically through the appearance of a field strength tensor $f_{μν}$, which takes on the values 0 or 1 only. It obeys a linear field equation with the loop current as source. This equation implies that $f_{μν}$ is non vanishing on a two-dimensional surface bounded by the loop, and possibly on closed surfaces. The two-dimensional surfaces have a natural interpretation as strings moving in euclidean time. In four dimensions we recover the dual Abrikosov string of a type II superconductor, i.e. an electric string encircled by a magnetic current. In contrast to other types of monopoles found in the literature, the monopoles and the associated magnetic currents are present in every configuration. With some plausible, though not generally conclusive, arguments we are directly led to the area law for large loops.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access