Researcher profile

Di Wen

Di Wen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

IMPACT-HOI: Supervisory Control for Onset-Anchored Partial HOI Event Construction

We present IMPACT-HOI, a mixed-initiative framework for annotating egocentric procedural video by constructing structured event graphs for Human-Object Interactions (HOI), motivated by the need for high-quality structured supervision for learning robot manipulation from human demonstration. IMPACT-HOI frames this task as the incremental resolution of a partially specified, onset-anchored event state. A trust-calibrated controller selects among direct queries, human-confirmed suggestions, and conservative completions based on empirical annotator behavior and evidence quality. A risk-bounded execution protocol, utilizing atomic rollback, ensures that human-confirmed decisions are preserved against conflicting automated updates. A user study with 9 participants shows a 13.5% reduction in manual annotation actions, a 46.67% event match rate, and zero confirmed-field violations under the studied protocol. The code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/541741106/IMPACT_HOI.

preprint2026arXiv

IMPACT-Scribe: Interactive Temporal Action Segmentation with Boundary Scribbles and Query Planning

Dense temporal annotation of procedural activity videos is vital for action understanding and embodied intelligence but remains labor-intensive due to reactive tools. Each correction is treated as an isolated edit, limiting reuse of information on annotator uncertainty and model reliability. We introduce IMPACT-Scribe, a correction-driven framework for dense labeling that uses each correction to improve future human-machine collaboration. IMPACT-Scribe combines uncertainty-aware boundary scribble supervision, local proposal modeling, cost-aware query planning, structured propagation, and correction-driven adaptation. Experiments and a human study show that this closed-loop design improves labeling quality per effort, enhances boundary accuracy, and fosters better human-machine interaction over time. The code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/BanzQians/IMPACT_AS.

preprint2020arXiv

Halo Counts-in-cells for Cosmological Models with Different Dark Energy

We examine the counts-in-cells probability distribution functions that describe dark matter halos in the Dark Energy Universe Simulations (DEUS). We describe the measurements between redshifts $z=0$ to $z=4$ on both linear and non-linear scales. The best-fits of the gravitational quasi-equilibrium distribution (GQED), the negative binomial distribution (NBD), the Poisson-Lognormal distribution (PLN), and the Poisson-Lognormal distribution with a bias parameter (PLNB) are compared to simulations. The fits agree reasonably consistently over a range of redshifts and scales. To distinguish quintessence (RPCDM) and phantom ($w$CDM) dark energy from $Λ$ dark energy, we present a new method that compares the model parameters of the counts-in-cells probability distribution functions. We find that the mean and variance of the halo counts-in-cells on $2-25h^{-1}$Mpc scales between redshifts $0.65<z<4$ show significant percentage differences for different dark energy cosmologies. On $15-25h^{-1}$Mpc scales, the $g$ parameter in NBD, $ω$ parameter in PLN, $b$ and $C_b$ parameters in PLNB show larger percentage differences for different dark energy cosmologies than on smaller scales. On $2-6h^{-1}$Mpc scales, kurtosis and the $b$ parameter in the GQED show larger percentage differences for different dark energy cosmologies than on larger scales. For cosmologies explored in the DEUS simulations, the percentage differences between these statistics for the RPCDM and $w$CDM dark energy cosmologies relative to $Λ$CDM generally increases with redshift from a few percent to significantly larger percentages at $z=4$. Applying our method to simulations and galaxy surveys can provide a useful way to distinguish among dark energy models and cosmologies in general.