BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Di Gao

Di Gao contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer VisionCryptography and Securityeess.IVHardware Architecturehep-phMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Study of form factors and branching ratios for $D\rightarrow S,Al\bar{ν_{l}}$ with light-cone sum rules

We systematically study the semileptonic decay process of $ D\rightarrow S,A l\bar{ν_{l}}(l=e,μ)$ by light-cone sum rules (LCSR) with chiral currents, calculate the form factors containing only the contribution of the leading twist light-cone distribution amplitudes (LCDAs). For scalar mesons $a_{0}(980)$ and $a_{0}(1450)$, we take them as $q\bar{q}$ states. For axial-vector meson, we study $a_{1}(1260)( 1^{3}p^{1})$ and $b_{1}(1235)( 1^{1}p^{1})$. Based on the results of these form factors, we further present the branching ratios of these semileptonic decay processes. The numerical results for $ D\rightarrow a_{0}(980), b_{1}(1235)l\bar{ν_{l}} $ are in good agreement with experiments and that for $ D\rightarrow a_{0}(1450)l\bar{ν_{l}}$ process are expected to be tested experimentally in the future.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Comparative Study for Non-rigid Image Registration and Rigid Image Registration

Image registration algorithms can be generally categorized into two groups: non-rigid and rigid. Recently, many deep learning-based algorithms employ a neural net to characterize non-rigid image registration function. However, do they always perform better? In this study, we compare the state-of-art deep learning-based non-rigid registration approach with rigid registration approach. The data is generated from Kaggle Dog vs Cat Competition \url{https://www.kaggle.com/c/dogs-vs-cats/} and we test the algorithms' performance on rigid transformation including translation, rotation, scaling, shearing and pixelwise non-rigid transformation. The Voxelmorph is trained on rigidset and nonrigidset separately for comparison and we also add a gaussian blur layer to its original architecture to improve registration performance. The best quantitative results in both root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) metrics for rigid registration are produced by SimpleElastix and non-rigid registration by Voxelmorph. We select representative samples for visual assessment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Eva-CiM: A System-Level Performance and Energy Evaluation Framework for Computing-in-Memory Architectures

Computing-in-Memory (CiM) architectures aim to reduce costly data transfers by performing arithmetic and logic operations in memory and hence relieve the pressure due to the memory wall. However, determining whether a given workload can really benefit from CiM, which memory hierarchy and what device technology should be adopted by a CiM architecture requires in-depth study that is not only time consuming but also demands significant expertise in architectures and compilers. This paper presents an energy evaluation framework, Eva-CiM, for systems based on CiM architectures. Eva-CiM encompasses a multi-level (from device to architecture) comprehensive tool chain by leveraging existing modeling and simulation tools such as GEM5, McPAT [2] and DESTINY [3]. To support high-confidence prediction, rapid design space exploration and ease of use, Eva-CiM introduces several novel modeling/analysis approaches including models for capturing memory access and dependency-aware ISA traces, and for quantifying interactions between the host CPU and CiM modules. Eva-CiM can readily produce energy estimates of the entire system for a given program, a processor architecture, and the CiM array and technology specifications. Eva-CiM is validated by comparing with DESTINY [3] and [4], and enables findings including practical contributions from CiM-supported accesses, CiM-sensitive benchmarking as well as the pros and cons of increased memory size for CiM. Eva-CiM also enables exploration over different configurations and device technologies, showing 1.3-6.0X energy improvement for SRAM and 2.0-7.9X for FeFET-RAM, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Private Knowledge Transfer via Model Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

The deployment of deep learning applications has to address the growing privacy concerns when using private and sensitive data for training. A conventional deep learning model is prone to privacy attacks that can recover the sensitive information of individuals from either model parameters or accesses to the target model. Recently, differential privacy that offers provable privacy guarantees has been proposed to train neural networks in a privacy-preserving manner to protect training data. However, many approaches tend to provide the worst case privacy guarantees for model publishing, inevitably impairing the accuracy of the trained models. In this paper, we present a novel private knowledge transfer strategy, where the private teacher trained on sensitive data is not publicly accessible but teaches a student to be publicly released. In particular, a three-player (teacher-student-discriminator) learning framework is proposed to achieve trade-off between utility and privacy, where the student acquires the distilled knowledge from the teacher and is trained with the discriminator to generate similar outputs as the teacher. We then integrate a differential privacy protection mechanism into the learning procedure, which enables a rigorous privacy budget for the training. The framework eventually allows student to be trained with only unlabelled public data and very few epochs, and hence prevents the exposure of sensitive training data, while ensuring model utility with a modest privacy budget. The experiments on MNIST, SVHN and CIFAR-10 datasets show that our students obtain the accuracy losses w.r.t teachers of 0.89%, 2.29%, 5.16%, respectively with the privacy bounds of (1.93, 10^-5), (5.02, 10^-6), (8.81, 10^-6). When compared with the existing works \cite{papernot2016semi,wang2019private}, the proposed work can achieve 5-82% accuracy loss improvement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access