BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dhanoop Karunakaran

Dhanoop Karunakaran contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
RoboticsArtificial IntelligencePerformance

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Automatic lane change scenario extraction and generation of scenarios in OpenX format from real-world data

Autonomous Vehicles (AV)'s wide-scale deployment appears imminent despite many safety challenges yet to be resolved. The modern autonomous vehicles will undoubtedly include machine learning and probabilistic techniques that add significant complexity to the traditional verification and validation methods. Road testing is essential before the deployment, but scenarios are repeatable, and it's hard to collect challenging events. Exploring numerous, diverse and crucial scenarios is a time-consuming and expensive approach. The research community and industry have widely accepted scenario-based testing in the last few years. As it is focused directly on the relevant critical road situations, it can reduce the effort required in testing. The scenario-based testing in simulation requires the realistic behaviour of the traffic participants to assess the System Under Test (SUT). It is essential to capture the scenarios from the real world to encode the behaviour of actual traffic participants. This paper proposes a novel scenario extraction method to capture the lane change scenarios using point-cloud data and object tracking information. This method enables fully automatic scenario extraction compared to similar approaches in this area. The generated scenarios are represented in OpenX format to reuse them in the SUT evaluation easily. The motivation of this framework is to build a validation dataset to generate many critical concrete scenarios. The code is available online at https://github.com/dkarunakaran/scenario_extraction_framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Critical concrete scenario generation using scenario-based falsification

Autonomous vehicles have the potential to lower the accident rate when compared to human driving. Moreover, it is the driving force of the automated vehicles' rapid development over the last few years. In the higher Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) automation level, the vehicle's and passengers' safety responsibility is transferred from the driver to the automated system, so thoroughly validating such a system is essential. Recently, academia and industry have embraced scenario-based evaluation as the complementary approach to road testing, reducing the overall testing effort required. It is essential to determine the system's flaws before deploying it on public roads as there is no safety driver to guarantee the reliability of such a system. This paper proposes a Reinforcement Learning (RL) based scenario-based falsification method to search for a high-risk scenario in a pedestrian crossing traffic situation. We define a scenario as risky when a system under testing (SUT) does not satisfy the requirement. The reward function for our RL approach is based on Intel's Responsibility Sensitive Safety(RSS), Euclidean distance, and distance to a potential collision.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Parameterisation of lane-change scenarios from real-world data

Recent Autonomous Vehicles (AV) technology includes machine learning and probabilistic techniques that add significant complexity to the traditional verification and validation methods. The research community and industry have widely accepted scenario-based testing in the last few years. As it is focused directly on the relevant crucial road situations, it can reduce the effort required in testing. Encoding real-world traffic participants' behaviour is essential to efficiently assess the System Under Test (SUT) in scenario-based testing. So, it is necessary to capture the scenario parameters from the real-world data that can model scenarios realistically in simulation. The primary emphasis of the paper is to identify the list of meaningful parameters that adequately model real-world lane-change scenarios. With these parameters, it is possible to build a parameter space capable of generating a range of challenging scenarios for AV testing efficiently. We validate our approach using Root Mean Square Error(RMSE) to compare the scenarios generated using the proposed parameters against the real-world trajectory data. In addition to that, we demonstrate that adding a slight disturbance to a few scenario parameters can generate different scenarios and utilise Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) metric to measure the scenarios' risk.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient statistical validation with edge cases to evaluate Highly Automated Vehicles

The widescale deployment of Autonomous Vehicles (AV) seems to be imminent despite many safety challenges that are yet to be resolved. It is well known that there are no universally agreed Verification and Validation (VV) methodologies to guarantee absolute safety, which is crucial for the acceptance of this technology. Existing standards focus on deterministic processes where the validation requires only a set of test cases that cover the requirements. Modern autonomous vehicles will undoubtedly include machine learning and probabilistic techniques that require a much more comprehensive testing regime due to the non-deterministic nature of the operating design domain. A rigourous statistical validation process is an essential component required to address this challenge. Most research in this area focuses on evaluating system performance in large scale real-world data gathering exercises (number of miles travelled), or randomised test scenarios in simulation. This paper presents a new approach to compute the statistical characteristics of a system's behaviour by biasing automatically generated test cases towards the worst case scenarios, identifying potential unsafe edge cases.We use reinforcement learning (RL) to learn the behaviours of simulated actors that cause unsafe behaviour measured by the well established RSS safety metric. We demonstrate that by using the method we can more efficiently validate a system using a smaller number of test cases by focusing the simulation towards the worst case scenario, generating edge cases that correspond to unsafe situations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access