BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Delia Kesner appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We show that call-by-need is observationally equivalent to weak-head needed reduction. The proof of this result uses a semantical argument based on a (non-idempotent) intersection type system called $\mathcal{V}$. Interestingly, system $\mathcal{V}$ also allows to syntactically identify all the weak-head needed redexes of a term.
The purpose of this paper is to identify programs with control operators whose reduction semantics are in exact correspondence. This is achieved by introducing a relation $\simeq$, defined over a revised presentation of Parigot's $λμ$-calculus we dub $ΛM$. Our result builds on two fundamental ingredients: (1) factorization of $λμ$-reduction into multiplicative and exponential steps by means of explicit term operators of $ΛM$, and (2) translation of $ΛM$-terms into Laurent's polarized proof-nets (PPN) such that cut-elimination in PPN simulates our calculus. Our proposed relation $\simeq$ is shown to characterize structural equivalence in PPN. Most notably, $\simeq$ is shown to be a strong bisimulation with respect to reduction in $ΛM$, i.e. two $\simeq$-equivalent terms have the exact same reduction semantics, a result which fails for Regnier's $σ$-equivalence in $λ$-calculus as well as for Laurent's $σ$-equivalence in $λμ$.
We study normalisation of multistep strategies, strategies that reduce a set of redexes at a time, focussing on the notion of necessary sets, those which contain at least one redex that cannot be avoided in order to reach a normal form. This is particularly appealing in the setting of non-sequential rewrite systems, in which terms that are not in normal form may not have any needed redex. We first prove a normalisation theorem for abstract rewrite systems (ARS), a general rewriting framework encompassing many rewriting systems developed by P-A.Melliès in his PhD thesis. The theorem states that multistep strategies reducing so called necessary and never-gripping sets of redexes at a time are normalising in any ARS. Gripping refers to an abstract property reflecting the behavior of higher-order substitution. We then apply this result to the particular case of PPC, a calculus of patterns and to the lambda-calculus with parallel-or.
This document contains the proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Logical and Semantic Frameworks, with Applications, which was held on September 29 and 30, 2012, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It contains 11 regular papers (9 long and 2 short) accepted for presentation at the meeting, as well as extended abstracts of invited talks by Torben Braüner (Roskilde University, Denmark), Maribel Fernández (King's College London, United Kingdom), Edward Hermann Haeusler (PUC-Rio, Brazil) and Alexandre Miquel (École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, France).
Inspired by a recent graphical formalism for lambda-calculus based on linear logic technology, we introduce an untyped structural lambda-calculus, called lambda j, which combines actions at a distance with exponential rules decomposing the substitution by means of weakening, contraction and derelicition. First, we prove some fundamental properties of lambda j such as confluence and preservation of beta-strong normalisation. Second, we add a strong bisimulation to lambda j by means of an equational theory which captures in particular Regnier's sigma-equivalence. We then complete this bisimulation with two more equations for (de)composition of substitutions and we prove that the resulting calculus still preserves beta-strong normalization. Finally, we discuss some consequences of our results.
This work gives some insights and results on standardisation for call-by-name pattern calculi. More precisely, we define standard reductions for a pattern calculus with constructor-based data terms and patterns. This notion is based on reduction steps that are needed to match an argument with respect to a given pattern. We prove the Standardisation Theorem by using the technique developed by Takahashi and Crary for lambda-calculus. The proof is based on the fact that any development can be specified as a sequence of head steps followed by internal reductions, i.e. reductions in which no head steps are involved.
Many different systems with explicit substitutions have been proposed to implement a large class of higher-order languages. Motivations and challenges that guided the development of such calculi in functional frameworks are surveyed in the first part of this paper. Then, very simple technology in named variable-style notation is used to establish a theory of explicit substitutions for the lambda-calculus which enjoys a whole set of useful properties such as full composition, simulation of one-step beta-reduction, preservation of beta-strong normalisation, strong normalisation of typed terms and confluence on metaterms. Normalisation of related calculi is also discussed.