BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Andrés Viso contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We show that call-by-need is observationally equivalent to weak-head needed reduction. The proof of this result uses a semantical argument based on a (non-idempotent) intersection type system called $\mathcal{V}$. Interestingly, system $\mathcal{V}$ also allows to syntactically identify all the weak-head needed redexes of a term.
The purpose of this paper is to identify programs with control operators whose reduction semantics are in exact correspondence. This is achieved by introducing a relation $\simeq$, defined over a revised presentation of Parigot's $λμ$-calculus we dub $ΛM$. Our result builds on two fundamental ingredients: (1) factorization of $λμ$-reduction into multiplicative and exponential steps by means of explicit term operators of $ΛM$, and (2) translation of $ΛM$-terms into Laurent's polarized proof-nets (PPN) such that cut-elimination in PPN simulates our calculus. Our proposed relation $\simeq$ is shown to characterize structural equivalence in PPN. Most notably, $\simeq$ is shown to be a strong bisimulation with respect to reduction in $ΛM$, i.e. two $\simeq$-equivalent terms have the exact same reduction semantics, a result which fails for Regnier's $σ$-equivalence in $λ$-calculus as well as for Laurent's $σ$-equivalence in $λμ$.
A type system combining type application, constants as types, union types (associative, commutative and idempotent) and recursive types has recently been proposed for statically typing path polymorphism, the ability to define functions that can operate uniformly over recursively specified applicative data structures. A typical pattern such functions resort to is $x\,y$ which decomposes a compound, in other words any applicative tree structure, into its parts. We study type-checking for this type system in two stages. First we propose algorithms for checking type equivalence and subtyping based on coinductive characterizations of those relations. We then formulate a syntax-directed presentation and prove its equivalence with the original one. This yields a type-checking algorithm which unfortunately has exponential time complexity in the worst case. A second algorithm is then proposed, based on automata techniques, which yields a polynomial-time type-checking algorithm.
Path polymorphism is the ability to define functions that can operate uniformly over arbitrary recursively specified data structures. Its essence is captured by patterns of the form $x\,y$ which decompose a compound data structure into its parts. Typing these kinds of patterns is challenging since the type of a compound should determine the type of its components. We propose a static type system (i.e. no run-time analysis) for a pattern calculus that captures this feature. Our solution combines type application, constants as types, union types and recursive types. We address the fundamental properties of Subject Reduction and Progress that guarantee a well-behaved dynamics. Both these results rely crucially on a notion of pattern compatibility and also on a coinductive characterisation of subtyping.