Researcher profile

David Mumford

David Mumford contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Geodesic Completeness for Sobolev Metrics on the Space of Immersed Plane Curves

We study properties of Sobolev-type metrics on the space of immersed plane curves. We show that the geodesic equation for Sobolev-type metrics with constant coefficients of order 2 and higher is globally well-posed for smooth initial data as well as initial data in certain Sobolev spaces. Thus the space of closed plane curves equipped with such a metric is geodesically complete. We find lower bounds for the geodesic distance in terms of curvature and its derivatives.

preprint2013arXiv

A zoo of diffeomorphism groups on $\mathbb R^n$

We consider the groups $\operatorname{Diff}_{\mathcal B}(\mathbb R^n)$, $\operatorname{Diff}_{H^\infty}(\mathbb R^n)$, and $\operatorname{Diff}_{\mathcal S}(\mathbb R^n)$ of smooth diffeomorphisms on $\mathbb R^n$ which differ from the identity by a function which is in either $\mathcal B$ (bounded in all derivatives), $H^\infty = \bigcap_{k\ge 0}H^k$, or $\mathcal S$ (rapidly decreasing). We show that all these groups are smooth regular Lie groups.

preprint2013arXiv

On Euler's equation and `EPDiff'

We study a family of approximations to Euler&#39;s equation depending on two parameters $\varepsilon,η\ge 0$. When $\varepsilon=η=0$ we have Euler&#39;s equation and when both are positive we have instances of the class of integro-differential equations called EPDiff in imaging science. These are all geodesic equations on either the full diffeomorphism group $\operatorname{Diff}_{H^\infty}(\mathbb R^n)$ or, if $\varepsilon = 0$, its volume preserving subgroup. They are defined by the right invariant metric induced by the norm on vector fields given by $$ \|v\|_{\varepsilon,η} = \int_{\mathbb R^n} <L_{\varepsilon,η} v, v> dx $$ where $L_{\varepsilon,η} = (I-\tfrac{η^2}{p} \triangle)^p \circ (I-\tfrac1{\varepsilon^2} \nabla \circ ÷)$. All geodesic equations are locally well-posed, and the $L_{\varepsilon,η}$-equation admits solutions for all time if $η>0$ and $p\ge (n+3)/2$. We tie together solutions of all these equations by estimates which, however, are only local in time. This approach leads to a new notion of momentum which is transported by the flow and serves as a generalization of vorticity. We also discuss how delta distribution momenta lead to &#34;vortex-solitons&#34;, also called &#34;landmarks&#34; in imaging science, and to new numeric approximations to fluids.

preprint2013arXiv

Sobolev Metrics on Diffeomorphism Groups and the Derived Geometry of Spaces of Submanifolds

Given a finite dimensional manifold $N$, the group $\operatorname{Diff}_{\mathcal S}(N)$ of diffeomorphism of $N$ which fall suitably rapidly to the identity, acts on the manifold $B(M,N)$ of submanifolds on $N$ of diffeomorphism type $M$ where $M$ is a compact manifold with $\dim M<\dim N$. For a right invariant weak Riemannian metric on $\operatorname{Diff}_{\mathcal S}(N)$ induced by a quite general operator $L:\frak X_{\mathcal S}(N)\to Γ(T^*N\otimes\operatorname{vol}(N))$, we consider the induced weak Riemannian metric on $B(M,N)$ and we compute its geodesics and sectional curvature. For that we derive a covariant formula for curvature in finite and infinite dimensions, we show how it makes O&#39;Neill&#39;s formula very transparent, and we use it finally to compute sectional curvature on $B(M,N)$.

preprint2011arXiv

Sectional Curvature in terms of the Cometric, with Applications to the Riemannian Manifolds of Landmarks

This paper deals with the computation of sectional curvature for the manifolds of $N$ landmarks (or feature points) in D dimensions, endowed with the Riemannian metric induced by the group action of diffeomorphisms. The inverse of the metric tensor for these manifolds (i.e. the cometric), when written in coordinates, is such that each of its elements depends on at most 2D of the ND coordinates. This makes the matrices of partial derivatives of the cometric very sparse in nature, thus suggesting solving the highly non-trivial problem of developing a formula that expresses sectional curvature in terms of the cometric and its first and second partial derivatives (we call this Mario&#39;s formula). We apply such formula to the manifolds of landmarks and in particular we fully explore the case of geodesics on which only two points have non-zero momenta and compute the sectional curvatures of 2-planes spanned by the tangents to such geodesics. The latter example gives insight to the geometry of the full manifolds of landmarks.

preprint2005arXiv

Vanishing geodesic distance on spaces of submanifolds and diffeomorphisms

The $L^2$-metric or Fubini-Study metric on the non-linear Grassmannian of all submanifolds of type $M$ in a Riemannian manifold $(N,g)$ induces geodesic distance 0. We discuss another metric which involves the mean curvature and shows that its geodesic distance is a good topological metric. The vanishing phenomenon for the geodesic distance holds also for all diffeomorphism groups for the $L^2$-metric.