Researcher profile

David Elizondo

David Elizondo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Semi-supervised Deep Learning for Image Classification with Distribution Mismatch: A Survey

Deep learning methodologies have been employed in several different fields, with an outstanding success in image recognition applications, such as material quality control, medical imaging, autonomous driving, etc. Deep learning models rely on the abundance of labelled observations to train a prospective model. These models are composed of millions of parameters to estimate, increasing the need of more training observations. Frequently it is expensive to gather labelled observations of data, making the usage of deep learning models not ideal, as the model might over-fit data. In a semi-supervised setting, unlabelled data is used to improve the levels of accuracy and generalization of a model with small labelled datasets. Nevertheless, in many situations different unlabelled data sources might be available. This raises the risk of a significant distribution mismatch between the labelled and unlabelled datasets. Such phenomena can cause a considerable performance hit to typical semi-supervised deep learning frameworks, which often assume that both labelled and unlabelled datasets are drawn from similar distributions. Therefore, in this paper we study the latest approaches for semi-supervised deep learning for image recognition. Emphasis is made in semi-supervised deep learning models designed to deal with a distribution mismatch between the labelled and unlabelled datasets. We address open challenges with the aim to encourage the community to tackle them, and overcome the high data demand of traditional deep learning pipelines under real-world usage settings.

preprint2020arXiv

Correcting Data Imbalance for Semi-Supervised Covid-19 Detection Using X-ray Chest Images

The Corona Virus (COVID-19) is an internationalpandemic that has quickly propagated throughout the world. The application of deep learning for image classification of chest X-ray images of Covid-19 patients, could become a novel pre-diagnostic detection methodology. However, deep learning architectures require large labelled datasets. This is often a limitation when the subject of research is relatively new as in the case of the virus outbreak, where dealing with small labelled datasets is a challenge. Moreover, in the context of a new highly infectious disease, the datasets are also highly imbalanced,with few observations from positive cases of the new disease. In this work we evaluate the performance of the semi-supervised deep learning architecture known as MixMatch using a very limited number of labelled observations and highly imbalanced labelled dataset. We propose a simple approach for correcting data imbalance, re-weight each observationin the loss function, giving a higher weight to the observationscorresponding to the under-represented class. For unlabelled observations, we propose the usage of the pseudo and augmentedlabels calculated by MixMatch to choose the appropriate weight. The MixMatch method combined with the proposed pseudo-label based balance correction improved classification accuracy by up to 10%, with respect to the non balanced MixMatch algorithm, with statistical significance. We tested our proposed approach with several available datasets using 10, 15 and 20 labelledobservations. Additionally, a new dataset is included among thetested datasets, composed of chest X-ray images of Costa Rican adult patients