Researcher profile

Darshan Kumar

Darshan Kumar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A non-parametric test of variability of Type Ia supernovae luminosity and CDDR

The first observational evidence for cosmic acceleration appeared from Type Ia supernovae (SNe Type Ia) Hubble diagram from two different groups. However, the empirical treatment of SNe Type Ia and their ability to show cosmic acceleration have been the subject of some debate in the literature. In this work we probe the assumption of redshift-independent absolute magnitude $(M_{\mathrm{B}})$ of SNe along with its correlation with spatial curvature ($Ω_{k0}$) and cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) parameter ($η(z)$). This work is divided into two parts. Firstly, we check the validity of CDDR which relates the luminosity distance ($d_L$) and angular diameter distance ($d_A$) via redshift. We use the Pantheon SNe Ia dataset combined with the $H(z)$ measurements derived from the cosmic chronometers. Further, four different redshift-dependent parametrizations of the distance duality parameter $(η(z))$ are used. The CDDR is fairly consistent for almost every parametrization within a $2σ$ confidence level in both flat and a non-flat universe. In the second part, we assume the validity of CDDR and emphasize on the variability of $M_{\mathrm{B}}$ and its correlation with $Ω_{k0}$. We choose four different redshift-dependent parametrizations of $M_{\mathrm{B}}$. The results indicate no evolution of $M_{\mathrm{B}}$ within $2σ$ confidence level. For all parametrizations, the best fit value of $Ω_{k0}$ indicates a flat universe at $2σ$ confidence level. However a mild inclination towards a non flat universe is also observed. We have also examined the dependence of the results on the choice of different priors for $H_0$.