Source author record

Akshay Rana

Akshay Rana appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A non-parametric test of variability of Type Ia supernovae luminosity and CDDR

The first observational evidence for cosmic acceleration appeared from Type Ia supernovae (SNe Type Ia) Hubble diagram from two different groups. However, the empirical treatment of SNe Type Ia and their ability to show cosmic acceleration have been the subject of some debate in the literature. In this work we probe the assumption of redshift-independent absolute magnitude $(M_{\mathrm{B}})$ of SNe along with its correlation with spatial curvature ($Ω_{k0}$) and cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) parameter ($η(z)$). This work is divided into two parts. Firstly, we check the validity of CDDR which relates the luminosity distance ($d_L$) and angular diameter distance ($d_A$) via redshift. We use the Pantheon SNe Ia dataset combined with the $H(z)$ measurements derived from the cosmic chronometers. Further, four different redshift-dependent parametrizations of the distance duality parameter $(η(z))$ are used. The CDDR is fairly consistent for almost every parametrization within a $2σ$ confidence level in both flat and a non-flat universe. In the second part, we assume the validity of CDDR and emphasize on the variability of $M_{\mathrm{B}}$ and its correlation with $Ω_{k0}$. We choose four different redshift-dependent parametrizations of $M_{\mathrm{B}}$. The results indicate no evolution of $M_{\mathrm{B}}$ within $2σ$ confidence level. For all parametrizations, the best fit value of $Ω_{k0}$ indicates a flat universe at $2σ$ confidence level. However a mild inclination towards a non flat universe is also observed. We have also examined the dependence of the results on the choice of different priors for $H_0$.

preprint2022arXiv

Strong lensing systems and galaxy cluster observations as probe to the cosmic distance duality relation

{In this paper, we use large scale structure observations to test the redshift dependence of cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR), $D_{\rm L}(1+z)^{-2}/D_{\rm A}=η(z)$}, with $D_{\rm L}$ and $D_{\rm A}$, being the luminosity and angular diameter distances, respectively. In order to perform the test, the following data set are considered: strong lensing systems and galaxy cluster measurements (gas mass fractions). No specific cosmological model is adopted, only a flat universe is assumed. { By considering two $η(z)$ parametrizations, It is observed that the CDDR remain redshift independent within $1.5σ$ which is in full agreement with other recent tests involving cosmological data}. It is worth to comment that our results are independent of the baryon budget of galaxy clusters.

preprint2016arXiv

Revisiting the distance duality relation using a non-parametric regression method

The interdependence of luminosity distance, $D_L$ and angular diameter distance, $D_A$ given by the distance duality relation (DDR) is very significant in observational cosmology. It is very closely tied with the temperature- redshift relation of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation. Any deviation from $η(z)\equiv \frac{D_L}{D_A (1+z)^2} =1$ indicates a possible emergence of new physics. Our aim in this work is to check the consistency of these relations using a non-parametric regression method namely, LOESS with SIMEX. This technique avoids dependency on the cosmological model and works with a minimal set of assumptions. Further, to analyze the efficiency of the methodology, we simulate a dataset of $200$ points of $η(z)$ data based on a phenomenological model $η(z)= (1+z)^ε$. The error on the simulated data points is obtained by using the temperature of CMB radiation at various redshifts. For testing the distance duality relation, we use the JLA SNe Ia data for luminosity distances, while the angular diameter distances are obtained from radio galaxies datasets. Since the DDR is linked with CMB temperature - redshift relation, therefore we also use the CMB temperature data to reconstruct $η(z)$. It is important to note that with CMB data, we are able to study the evolution of DDR up to a very high redshift $ z = 2.418$. In this analysis, we find no evidence of deviation from $η=1$ within a $1σ$ region in the entire redshift range used in this analysis ($0 < z \leq 2.418$).