Source author record

Daniel Y. Takahashi

Daniel Y. Takahashi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.ST Statistics Theory Methodology Neurons and Cognition

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Sharp oracle inequalities and slope heuristic for specification probabilities estimation in discrete random fields

We study the problem of estimating the one-point specification probabilities in non-necessary finite discrete random fields from partially observed independent samples. Our procedures are based on model selection by minimization of a penalized empirical criterion. The selected estimators satisfy sharp oracle inequalities in $L_2$-risk. We also obtain theoretical results on the slope heuristic for this problem, justifying the slope algorithm to calibrate the leading constant in the penalty. The practical performances of our methods are investigated in two simulation studies. We illustrate the usefulness of our approach by applying the methods to a multi-unit neuronal data from a rat hippocampus.

preprint2015arXiv

Consolidating a Link Centered Neural Connectivity Framework with Directed Transfer Function Asymptotics

We present a unified mathematical derivation of the asymptotic behaviour of three of the main forms of \textit{directed transfer function} (DTF) complementing recent partial directed coherence (PDC) results \cite{Baccala2013}. Based on these results and numerical examples we argue for a new directed `link' centered neural connectivity framework to replace the widespread correlation based effective/functional network concepts so that directed network influences between structures become classified as to whether links are \textit{active} in a \textit{direct} or in an \textit{indirect} way thereby leading to the new notions of \textit{Granger connectivity} and \textit{Granger influenciability} which are more descriptive than speaking of Granger causality alone.

preprint2013arXiv

A statistical test to identify differences in clustering structures

Statistical inference on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is an important task in brain imaging. One major hypothesis is that the presence or not of a psychiatric disorder can be explained by the differential clustering of neurons in the brain. In view of this fact, it is clearly of interest to address the question of whether the properties of the clusters have changed between groups of patients and controls. The normal method of approaching group differences in brain imaging is to carry out a voxel-wise univariate analysis for a difference between the mean group responses using an appropriate test (e.g. a t-test) and to assemble the resulting "significantly different voxels" into clusters, testing again at cluster level. In this approach of course, the primary voxel-level test is blind to any cluster structure. Direct assessments of differences between groups (or reproducibility within groups) at the cluster level have been rare in brain imaging. For this reason, we introduce a novel statistical test called ANOCVA - ANalysis Of Cluster structure Variability, which statistically tests whether two or more populations are equally clustered using specific features. The proposed method allows us to compare the clustering structure of multiple groups simultaneously, and also to identify features that contribute to the differential clustering. We illustrate the performance of ANOCVA through simulations and an application to an fMRI data set composed of children with ADHD and controls. Results show that there are several differences in the brain's clustering structure between them, corroborating the hypothesis in the literature. Furthermore, we identified some brain regions previously not described, generating new hypothesis to be tested empirically.