BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Daniel V. Tausk

Daniel V. Tausk contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.FAquant-phApplicationsmath-phmath.GNmath.MP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Extension of $c_0(I)$-valued operators on spaces of continuous functions on compact lines

We investigate the problem of existence of a bounded extension to $C(K)$ of a bounded $c_0(I)$-valued operator $T$ defined on the subalgebra of $C(K)$ induced by a continuous increasing surjection $ϕ:K\to L$, where $K$ and $L$ are compact lines. Generalizations of some of the results of [6] about extension of $c_0$-valued operators are obtained. For instance, we prove that when a bounded extension of $T$ exists then an extension can be obtained with norm at most twice the norm of $T$. Moreover, the class of compact lines $L$ for which the $c_0$-extension property is equivalent to the $c_0(I)$-extension property for any continuous increasing surjection $ϕ:K\to L$ is studied.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the incorrect use of Carlisle's method for dichotomous variables

In 2017, J. B. Carlisle has proposed a method for fraud detection in randomized controlled trials based on a comparison of reported baseline data between treatment groups. While Carlisle has only used the method for continuous variables, some authors have recently employed a naive adaption of the method for dichotomous variables. We explain why such adaptation leads to p-values that are wrong by orders of magnitude and we make a simple concrete proposal for correction of the method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On extensions of $c_0$-valued operators

We study pairs of Banach spaces $(X,Y)$, with $Y\subset X$, for which the thesis of Sobczyk's theorem holds, namely, such that every bounded $c_0$-valued operator defined in $Y$ extends to $X$. We are mainly concerned with the case when $X$ is a $C(K)$ space and $Y\equiv C(L)$ is a Banach subalgebra of $C(K)$. The main result of the article states that, if $K$ is a compact line and $L$ is countable, then every bounded $c_0$-valued operator defined in $C(L)$ extends to $C(K)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Can We Make a Bohmian Electron Reach the Speed of Light, at Least for One Instant?

In Bohmian mechanics, a version of quantum mechanics that ascribes world lines to electrons, we can meaningfully ask about an electron's instantaneous speed relative to a given inertial frame. Interestingly, according to the relativistic version of Bohmian mechanics using the Dirac equation, a massive particle's speed is less than or equal to the speed of light, but not necessarily less. That is, there are situations in which the particle actually reaches the speed of light---a very non-classical behavior. That leads us to the question of whether such situations can be arranged experimentally. We prove a theorem, Theorem 5, implying that for generic initial wave functions the probability that the particle ever reaches the speed of light, even if at only one point in time, is zero. We conclude that the answer to the question is no. Since a trajectory reaches the speed of light whenever the quantum probability current psi-bar gamma^mu psi is a lightlike 4-vector, our analysis concerns the current vector field of a generic wave function and may thus be of interest also independently of Bohmian mechanics. The fact that the current is never spacelike has been used to argue against the possibility of faster-than-light tunnelling through a barrier, a somewhat similar question. Theorem 5, as well as a more general version provided by Theorem 6, are also interesting in their own right. They concern a certain property of a function psi: R^4 --> C^4 that is crucial to the question of reaching the speed of light, namely being transverse to a certain submanifold of C^4 along a given compact subset of space-time. While it follows from the known transversality theorem of differential topology that this property is generic among smooth functions psi: R^4 --> C^4, Theorem 5 asserts that it is also generic among smooth solutions of the Dirac equation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

What Does the Free Will Theorem Actually Prove?

Conway and Kochen have presented a "free will theorem" (Notices of the AMS 56, pgs. 226-232 (2009)) which they claim shows that "if indeed we humans have free will, then [so do] elementary particles." In a more precise fashion, they claim it shows that for certain quantum experiments in which the experimenters can choose between several options, no deterministic or stochastic model can account for the observed outcomes without violating a condition "MIN" motivated by relativistic symmetry. We point out that for stochastic models this conclusion is not correct, while for deterministic models it is not new.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access