Source author record

Daniel V. Tausk

Daniel V. Tausk appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

13works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Extension of $c_0(I)$-valued operators on spaces of continuous functions on compact lines

We investigate the problem of existence of a bounded extension to $C(K)$ of a bounded $c_0(I)$-valued operator $T$ defined on the subalgebra of $C(K)$ induced by a continuous increasing surjection $ϕ:K\to L$, where $K$ and $L$ are compact lines. Generalizations of some of the results of [6] about extension of $c_0$-valued operators are obtained. For instance, we prove that when a bounded extension of $T$ exists then an extension can be obtained with norm at most twice the norm of $T$. Moreover, the class of compact lines $L$ for which the $c_0$-extension property is equivalent to the $c_0(I)$-extension property for any continuous increasing surjection $ϕ:K\to L$ is studied.

preprint2022arXiv

On the incorrect use of Carlisle's method for dichotomous variables

In 2017, J. B. Carlisle has proposed a method for fraud detection in randomized controlled trials based on a comparison of reported baseline data between treatment groups. While Carlisle has only used the method for continuous variables, some authors have recently employed a naive adaption of the method for dichotomous variables. We explain why such adaptation leads to p-values that are wrong by orders of magnitude and we make a simple concrete proposal for correction of the method.

preprint2014arXiv

Reply to "Maximal violation of Bell inequalities by position measurements"

In a recent article, Kiukas and Werner claim to have shown that Bohmian Mechanics does not make the same empirical predictions as ordinary Quantum Mechanics. More precisely, they have shown that ordinary Quantum Mechanics predicts maximal violations of the CHSH-Bell inequality for a certain experiment in which only position measurements are performed on two noninteracting entangled free non-relativistic particles. Kiukas and Werner claim that Bohmian Mechanics doesn't predict a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality for that experiment. We explain that such claim is wrong and that the argument supporting their claim neglects the fact that Bohmian Mechanics does not satisfy all the assumptions needed to prove the CHSH-Bell inequality. We also clear up another few misconceptions about Bohmian Mechanics appearing in their article.

preprint2013arXiv

Extension property and complementation of isometric copies of continuous functions spaces

In this article we prove that every isometric copy of C(L) in C(K) is complemented if L is compact Hausdorff of finite height and K is a compact Hausdorff space satisfying the extension property, i.e., every closed subset of K admits an extension operator. The space C(L) can be replaced by its subspace C(L|F) consisting of functions that vanish on a closed subset F of L. We also study the class of spaces having the extension property, establishing some closure results for this class and relating it to other classes of compact spaces.

preprint2013arXiv

On extensions of $c_0$-valued operators

We study pairs of Banach spaces $(X,Y)$, with $Y\subset X$, for which the thesis of Sobczyk's theorem holds, namely, such that every bounded $c_0$-valued operator defined in $Y$ extends to $X$. We are mainly concerned with the case when $X$ is a $C(K)$ space and $Y\equiv C(L)$ is a Banach subalgebra of $C(K)$. The main result of the article states that, if $K$ is a compact line and $L$ is countable, then every bounded $c_0$-valued operator defined in $C(L)$ extends to $C(K)$.

preprint2011arXiv

Can We Make a Bohmian Electron Reach the Speed of Light, at Least for One Instant?

In Bohmian mechanics, a version of quantum mechanics that ascribes world lines to electrons, we can meaningfully ask about an electron's instantaneous speed relative to a given inertial frame. Interestingly, according to the relativistic version of Bohmian mechanics using the Dirac equation, a massive particle's speed is less than or equal to the speed of light, but not necessarily less. That is, there are situations in which the particle actually reaches the speed of light---a very non-classical behavior. That leads us to the question of whether such situations can be arranged experimentally. We prove a theorem, Theorem 5, implying that for generic initial wave functions the probability that the particle ever reaches the speed of light, even if at only one point in time, is zero. We conclude that the answer to the question is no. Since a trajectory reaches the speed of light whenever the quantum probability current psi-bar gamma^mu psi is a lightlike 4-vector, our analysis concerns the current vector field of a generic wave function and may thus be of interest also independently of Bohmian mechanics. The fact that the current is never spacelike has been used to argue against the possibility of faster-than-light tunnelling through a barrier, a somewhat similar question. Theorem 5, as well as a more general version provided by Theorem 6, are also interesting in their own right. They concern a certain property of a function psi: R^4 --> C^4 that is crucial to the question of reaching the speed of light, namely being transverse to a certain submanifold of C^4 along a given compact subset of space-time. While it follows from the known transversality theorem of differential topology that this property is generic among smooth functions psi: R^4 --> C^4, Theorem 5 asserts that it is also generic among smooth solutions of the Dirac equation.

preprint2009arXiv

What Does the Free Will Theorem Actually Prove?

Conway and Kochen have presented a "free will theorem" (Notices of the AMS 56, pgs. 226-232 (2009)) which they claim shows that "if indeed we humans have free will, then [so do] elementary particles." In a more precise fashion, they claim it shows that for certain quantum experiments in which the experimenters can choose between several options, no deterministic or stochastic model can account for the observed outcomes without violating a condition "MIN" motivated by relativistic symmetry. We point out that for stochastic models this conclusion is not correct, while for deterministic models it is not new.