Source author record

Daniel Park

Daniel Park appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Generation & Evaluation of Adversarial Examples for Malware Obfuscation

There has been an increased interest in the application of convolutional neural networks for image based malware classification, but the susceptibility of neural networks to adversarial examples allows malicious actors to evade classifiers. Adversarial examples are usually generated by adding small perturbations to the input that are unrecognizable to humans, but the same approach is not effective with malware. In general, these perturbations cause changes in the byte sequences that change the initial functionality or result in un-executable binaries. We present a generative model for executable adversarial malware examples using obfuscation that achieves a high misclassification rate, up to 100% and 98% in white-box and black-box settings respectively, and demonstrates transferability. We further evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method by reporting insignificant change in the evasion rate of our adversarial examples against popular defense strategies.

preprint2016arXiv

Estimating the coherence of noise in quantum control of a solid-state qubit

To exploit a given physical system for quantum information processing, it is critical to understand the different types of noise affecting quantum control. Distinguishing coherent and incoherent errors is extremely useful as they can be reduced in different ways. Coherent errors are generally easier to reduce at the hardware level, e.g. by improving calibration, whereas some sources of incoherent errors, e.g. T2* processes, can be reduced by engineering robust pulses. In this work, we illustrate how purity benchmarking and randomized benchmarking can be used together to distinguish between coherent and incoherent errors and to quantify the reduction in both of them due to using optimal control pulses and accounting for the transfer function in an electron spin resonance system. We also prove that purity benchmarking provides bounds on the optimal fidelity and diamond norm that can be achieved by correcting the coherent errors through improving calibration.