Deontic modality based on preference
Deontic modalities are here defined in terms of the preference relation explored in our previous work (Osherson and Weinstein, 2012). Some consequences of the system are discussed.
Discover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Daniel Osherson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
Deontic modalities are here defined in terms of the preference relation explored in our previous work (Osherson and Weinstein, 2012). Some consequences of the system are discussed.
The theory of random real numbers is exceedingly well-developed, and fascinating from many points of view. It is also quite challenging mathematically. The present notes are intended as no more than a gateway to the larger theory. They review just the most elementary part of the theory (bearing on Kolmogorov- and ML-randomness). We hope that the simple arguments presented here will encourage the enterprising student to examine richer treatments of the subject available elsewhere, notably, in Downey and Hirschfeldt (2010).
The logic of reason-based preference advanced in Osherson and Weinstein (2012) is extended to quantifiers. Basic properties of the new system are discussed.
In this note, we show that classical statistical tests for randomness are language dependent.
We provide self-contained proof of a theorem relating probabilistic coherence of forecasts to their non-domination by rival forecasts with respect to any proper scoring rule. The theorem appears to be new but is closely related to results achieved by other investigators.