Source author record

Daniel Nevo

Daniel Nevo appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Methodology Applications math.ST Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

A sensitivity analysis approach for the causal hazard ratio in randomized and observational studies

The Hazard Ratio (HR) is often reported as the main causal effect when studying survival data. Despite its popularity, the HR suffers from an unclear causal interpretation. As already pointed out in the literature, there is a built-in selection bias in the HR, because similarly to the truncation by death problem, the HR conditions on post-treatment survival. A recently proposed alternative, inspired by the Survivor Average Causal Effect (SACE), is the causal HR, defined as the ratio between hazards across treatment groups among the study participants that would have survived regardless of their treatment assignment. We discuss the challenge in identifying the causal HR and present a sensitivity analysis identification approach in randomized controlled trials utilizing a working frailty model. We further extend our framework to adjust for potential confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting. We present a Cox-based and a flexible non-parametric kernel-based estimation under right censoring. We study the finite-sample properties of the proposed estimation method through simulations. We illustrate the utility of our framework using two real-data examples.

preprint2022arXiv

The Subtype-Free Average Causal Effect for Heterogeneous Disease Etiology

Studies have shown that the effect an exposure may have on a disease can vary for different subtypes of the same disease. However, existing approaches to estimate and compare these effects largely overlook causality. In this paper, we study the effect smoking may have on having colorectal cancer subtypes defined by a trait known as microsatellite instability (MSI). We use principal stratification to propose an alternative causal estimand, the Subtype-Free Average Causal Effect (SF-ACE). The SF-ACE is the causal effect of the exposure among those who would be free from other disease subtypes under any exposure level. We study non-parametric identification of the SF-ACE, and discuss different monotonicity assumptions, which are more nuanced than in the standard setting. As is often the case with principal stratum effects, the assumptions underlying the identification of the SF-ACE from the data are untestable and can be too strong. Therefore, we also develop sensitivity analysis methods that relax these assumptions. We present three different estimators, including a doubly-robust estimator, for the SF-ACE. We implement our methodology for data from two large cohorts to study the heterogeneity in the causal effect of smoking on colorectal cancer with respect to MSI subtypes.

preprint2020arXiv

Modeling semi-competing risks data as a longitudinal bivariate process

The Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study is a long-running prospective study of incident all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD). As the cohort ages, death (a terminal event) is a prominent competing risk for AD (a non-terminal event), although the reverse is not the case. As such, analyses of data from ACT can be placed within the semi-competing risks framework. Central to semi-competing risks, and in contrast to standard competing risks, is that one can learn about the dependence structure between the two events. To-date, however, most methods for semi-competing risks treat dependence as a nuisance and not a potential source of new clinical knowledge. We propose a novel regression-based framework that views the two time-to-event outcomes through the lens of a longitudinal bivariate process on a partition of the time scale. A key innovation of the framework is that dependence is represented in two distinct forms, $\textit{local}$ and $\textit{global}$ dependence, both of which have intuitive clinical interpretations. Estimation and inference are performed via penalized maximum likelihood, and can accommodate right censoring, left truncation and time-varying covariates. The framework is used to investigate the role of gender and having $\ge$1 APOE-$\epsilon4$ allele on the joint risk of AD and death.

preprint2016arXiv

On Bayesian robust regression with diverging number of predictors

This paper concerns the robust regression model when the number of predictors and the number of observations grow in a similar rate. Theory for M-estimators in this regime has been recently developed by several authors [El Karoui et al., 2013, Bean et al., 2013, Donoho and Montanari, 2013]. Motivated by the inability of M-estimators to successfully estimate the Euclidean norm of the coefficient vector, we consider a Bayesian framework for this model. We suggest a two-component mixture of normals prior for the coefficients and develop a Gibbs sampler procedure for sampling from relevant posterior distributions, while utilizing a scale mixture of normal representation for the error distribution . Unlike M-estimators, the proposed Bayes estimator is consistent in the Euclidean norm sense. Simulation results demonstrate the superiority of the Bayes estimator over traditional estimation methods.

preprint2016arXiv

The competing risks Cox model with and without auxiliary case covariates under weaker or no missing-at-random cause of failure

In the analysis of time-to-event data with multiple causes using a competing risks Cox model, often the cause of failure is unknown for some of the cases. The probability of a missing cause is typically assumed to be independent of the cause given the time of the event and covariates measured before the event occurred. In practice, however, the underlying missing-at-random assumption does not necessarily hold. Motivated by colorectal cancer subtype analysis, we develop semiparametric methods to conduct valid analysis, first when additional auxiliary variables are available for cases only. We consider a weaker missing-at-random assumption, with missing pattern depending on the observed quantities, which include the auxiliary covariates. Overlooking these covariates will potentially result in biased estimates. We use an informative likelihood approach that will yield consistent estimates even when the underlying model for missing cause of failure is misspecified. We then consider a method to conduct valid statistical analysis when there are no auxiliary covariates in the not missing-at-random scenario. The superiority of our methods in finite samples is demonstrated by simulation study results. We illustrate the use of our method in an analysis of colorectal cancer data from the Nurses' Health Study cohort, where, apparently, the traditional missing-at-random assumption fails to hold for particular molecular subtypes.

preprint2015arXiv

Identifying a minimal class of models for high-dimensional data

Model selection consistency in the high-dimensional regression setting can be achieved only if strong assumptions are fulfilled. We therefore suggest to pursue a different goal, which we call a minimal class of models. The minimal class of models includes models that are similar in their prediction accuracy but not necessarily in their elements. We suggest a random search algorithm to reveal candidate models. The algorithm implements simulated annealing while using a score for each predictor that we suggest to derive using a combination of the Lasso and the Elastic Net. The utility of using a minimal class of models is demonstrated in the analysis of two datasets.

preprint2012arXiv

Around the goal: Examining the effect of the first goal on the second goal in soccer using survival analysis methods

In this paper we apply survival techniques to soccer data, treating a goal scoring as the event of interest. It specifically concerns the relationship between the time of the first goal in the game and the time of the second goal. In order to do so, the relevant survival analysis concepts are readjusted to fit the problem and a Cox model is developed for the hazard function. Attributes such as time dependent covariates and a frailty term are also being considered. We also use a reliable propensity score to summarize the pre-game covariates. The conclusions derived from the results are that a first goal occurrence could either expedite or impede the next goal scoring, depending on the time it was scored. Moreover, once a goal is scored, another goal scoring become more and more likely as the game progresses. Furthermore, the first goal effect is the same whether the goal was scored or conceded.