Source author record

Daniel J. Abadi

Daniel J. Abadi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Databases Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

C5: Cloned Concurrency Control that Always Keeps Up

Asynchronously replicated primary-backup databases are commonly deployed to improve availability and offload read-only transactions. To both apply replicated writes from the primary and serve read-only transactions, the backups implement a cloned concurrency control protocol. The protocol ensures read-only transactions always return a snapshot of state that previously existed on the primary. This compels the backup to exactly copy the commit order resulting from the primary's concurrency control. Existing cloned concurrency control protocols guarantee this by limiting the backup's parallelism. As a result, the primary's concurrency control executes some workloads with more parallelism than these protocols. In this paper, we prove that this parallelism gap leads to unbounded replication lag, where writes can take arbitrarily long to replicate to the backup and which has led to catastrophic failures in production systems. We then design C5, the first cloned concurrency protocol to provide bounded replication lag. We implement two versions of C5: Our evaluation in MyRocks, a widely deployed database, demonstrates C5 provides bounded replication lag. Our evaluation in Cicada, a recent in-memory database, demonstrates C5 keeps up with even the fastest of primaries.

preprint2016arXiv

Design Principles for Scaling Multi-core OLTP Under High Contention

Although significant recent progress has been made in improving the multi-core scalability of high throughput transactional database systems, modern systems still fail to achieve scalable throughput for workloads involving frequent access to highly contended data. Most of this inability to achieve high throughput is explained by the fundamental constraints involved in guaranteeing ACID --- the addition of cores results in more concurrent transactions accessing the same contended data for which access must be serialized in order to guarantee isolation. Thus, linear scalability for contended workloads is impossible. However, there exist flaws in many modern architectures that exacerbate their poor scalability, and result in throughput that is much worse than fundamentally required by the workload. In this paper we identify two prevalent design principles that limit the multi-core scalability of many (but not all) transactional database systems on contended workloads: the multi-purpose nature of execution threads in these systems, and the lack of advanced planning of data access. We demonstrate the deleterious results of these design principles by implementing a prototype system, ORTHRUS, that is motivated by the principles of separation of database component functionality and advanced planning of transactions. We find that these two principles alone result in significantly improved scalability on high-contention workloads, and an order of magnitude increase in throughput for a non-trivial subset of these contended workloads.

preprint2015arXiv

Rethinking serializable multiversion concurrency control

Multi-versioned database systems have the potential to significantly increase the amount of concurrency in transaction processing because they can avoid read-write conflicts. Unfortunately, the increase in concurrency usually comes at the cost of transaction serializability. If a database user requests full serializability, modern multi-versioned systems significantly constrain read-write concurrency among conflicting transactions and employ expensive synchronization patterns in their design. In main-memory multi-core settings, these additional constraints are so burdensome that multi-versioned systems are often significantly outperformed by single-version systems. We propose Bohm, a new concurrency control protocol for main-memory multi-versioned database systems. Bohm guarantees serializable execution while ensuring that reads never block writes. In addition, Bohm does not require reads to perform any book-keeping whatsoever, thereby avoiding the overhead of tracking reads via contended writes to shared memory. This leads to excellent scalability and performance in multi-core settings. Bohm has all the above characteristics without performing validation based concurrency control. Instead, it is pessimistic, and is therefore not prone to excessive aborts in the presence of contention. An experimental evaluation shows that Bohm performs well in both high contention and low contention settings, and is able to dramatically outperform state-of-the-art multi-versioned systems despite maintaining the full set of serializability guarantees.