BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Daniel Bundala

Daniel Bundala contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsLogic in Computer ScienceProgramming Languages

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

On Systematic Testing for Execution-Time Analysis

Given a program and a time deadline, does the program finish before the deadline when executed on a given platform? With the requirement to produce a test case when such a violation can occur, we refer to this problem as the worst-case execution-time testing (WCETT) problem. In this paper, we present an approach for solving the WCETT problem for loop-free programs by timing the execution of a program on a small number of carefully calculated inputs. We then create a sequence of integer linear programs the solutions of which encode the best timing model consistent with the measurements. By solving the programs we can find the worst-case input as well as estimate execution time of any other input. Our solution is more accurate than previous approaches and, unlikely previous work, by increasing the number of measurements we can produce WCETT bounds up to any desired accuracy. Timing of a program depends on the properties of the platform it executes on. We further show how our approach can be used to quantify the timing repeatability of the underlying platform.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the Complexity of Temporal-Logic Path Checking

Given a formula in a temporal logic such as LTL or MTL, a fundamental problem is the complexity of evaluating the formula on a given finite word. For LTL, the complexity of this task was recently shown to be in NC. In this paper, we present an NC algorithm for MTL, a quantitative (or metric) extension of LTL, and give an NCC algorithm for UTL, the unary fragment of LTL. At the time of writing, MTL is the most expressive logic with an NC path-checking algorithm, and UTL is the most expressive fragment of LTL with a more efficient path-checking algorithm than for full LTL (subject to standard complexity-theoretic assumptions). We then establish a connection between LTL path checking and planar circuits, which we exploit to show that any further progress in determining the precise complexity of LTL path checking would immediately entail more efficient evaluation algorithms than are known for a certain class of planar circuits. The connection further implies that the complexity of LTL path checking depends on the Boolean connectives allowed: adding Boolean exclusive or yields a temporal logic with P-complete path-checking problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Optimal Sorting Networks

This paper settles the optimality of sorting networks given in The Art of Computer Programming vol. 3 more than 40 years ago. The book lists efficient sorting networks with n <= 16 inputs. In this paper we give general combinatorial arguments showing that if a sorting network with a given depth exists then there exists one with a special form. We then construct propositional formulas whose satisfiability is necessary for the existence of such a network. Using a SAT solver we conclude that the listed networks have optimal depth. For n <= 10 inputs where optimality was known previously, our algorithm is four orders of magnitude faster than those in prior work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access