Source author record

Dan Navon

Dan Navon appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Random Search Hyper-Parameter Tuning: Expected Improvement Estimation and the Corresponding Lower Bound

Hyperparameter tuning is a common technique for improving the performance of neural networks. Most techniques for hyperparameter search involve an iterated process where the model is retrained at every iteration. However, the expected accuracy improvement from every additional search iteration, is still unknown. Calculating the expected improvement can help create stopping rules for hyperparameter tuning and allow for a wiser allocation of a project's computational budget. In this paper, we establish an empirical estimate for the expected accuracy improvement from an additional iteration of hyperparameter search. Our results hold for any hyperparameter tuning method which is based on random search \cite{bergstra2012random} and samples hyperparameters from a fixed distribution. We bound our estimate with an error of $O\left(\sqrt{\frac{\log k}{k}}\right)$ w.h.p. where $k$ is the current number of iterations. To the best of our knowledge this is the first bound on the expected gain from an additional iteration of hyperparameter search. Finally, we demonstrate that the optimal estimate for the expected accuracy will still have an error of $\frac{1}{k}$.

preprint2022arXiv

The Inductive Bias of In-Context Learning: Rethinking Pretraining Example Design

Pretraining Neural Language Models (NLMs) over a large corpus involves chunking the text into training examples, which are contiguous text segments of sizes processable by the neural architecture. We highlight a bias introduced by this common practice: we prove that the pretrained NLM can model much stronger dependencies between text segments that appeared in the same training example, than it can between text segments that appeared in different training examples. This intuitive result has a twofold role. First, it formalizes the motivation behind a broad line of recent successful NLM training heuristics, proposed for the pretraining and fine-tuning stages, which do not necessarily appear related at first glance. Second, our result clearly indicates further improvements to be made in NLM pretraining for the benefit of Natural Language Understanding tasks. As an example, we propose "kNN-Pretraining": we show that including semantically related non-neighboring sentences in the same pretraining example yields improved sentence representations and open domain question answering abilities. This theoretically motivated degree of freedom for pretraining example design indicates new training schemes for self-improving representations.