Source author record

Dan Hathaway

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

7 publications

preprint2023arXiv

Applying Generic Coding with Help to Uniformizations

This is a follow up to a paper by the author where the disjointness relation for (the graphs of) definable functions from ωω{^ωω} to ωω{^ωω} is analyzed. In that paper, for each a∈ωωa \in {^ωω} we defined a Baire class one function faGC:ωω→ωωf_a^{GC} : {^ωω} \to {^ωω} which encoded aa in a certain sense. Given g:ωω→ωωg : {^ωω} \to {^ωω}, let Ψ(g)Ψ(g) be the statement that gg is disjoint from at most countably many of the functions faGCf_a^{GC}. We show the consistency strength of (∀g) Ψ(g)(\forall g)\, Ψ(g) is at most one inaccessible cardinal. We show that $\mbox{AD}^+$ implies (∀g) Ψ(g)(\forall g)\, Ψ(g). Finally, we show that assuming large cardinals, (∀g) Ψ(g)(\forall g)\, Ψ(g) holds in models of the form L(R[U]L(\mathbb{R} [\mathcal{U}] where U\mathcal{U} is a selective ultrafilter on ωω.

preprint2020arXiv

Perfect Tree Forcings for Singular Cardinals

We investigate forcing properties of perfect tree forcings defined by Prikry to answer a question of Solovay in the late 1960's regarding first failures of distributivity. Given a strictly increasing sequence of regular cardinals ⟨κn:n<ω⟩\langle κ_n: n< ω\rangle, Prikry defined the forcing P\mathbb{P} all perfect subtrees of ∏n<ωκn\prod_{n<ω}κ_n, and proved that for κ=sup⁡n<ωκnκ=\sup_{n<ω}κ_n, assuming the necessary cardinal arithmetic, the Boolean completion B\mathbb{B} of P\mathbb{P} is (ω,μ)(ω,μ)-distributive for all μ<κμ<κ but (ω,κ,δ)(ω,κ,δ)-distributivity fails for all δ<κδ<κ, implying failure of the (ω,κ)(ω,κ)-d.l. These hitherto unpublished results are included, setting the stage for the following recent results. P\mathbb{P} satisfies a Sacks-type property, implying that B\mathbb{B} is (ω,∞,<κ)(ω,\infty,<κ)-distributive. The (h,2)(\mathfrak{h},2)-d.l. and the (d,∞,<κ)(\mathfrak{d},\infty,<κ)-d.l. fail in B\mathbb{B}. $\mathcal{P}(ω)/\mbox{Fin}$ completely embeds into B\mathbb{B}. Also, B\mathbb{B} collapses κωκ^ω to h\mathfrak{h}. We further prove that if κκ is a limit of countably many measurable cardinals, then B\mathbb{B} adds a minimal degree of constructibility for new ωω-sequences. Some of these results generalize to cardinals κκ with uncountable cofinality.

preprint2016arXiv

Weak Distributivity Implying Distributivity

Let B\mathbb{B} be a complete Boolean algebra. We show, as an application of a previous result of the author, that if λλ is an infinite cardinal and B\mathbb{B} is weakly (λω,ω)(λ^ω, ω)-distributive, then B\mathbb{B} is (λ,2)(λ, 2)-distributive. Using a parallel result, we show that if κκ is a weakly compact cardinal such that B\mathbb{B} is weakly (2κ,κ)(2^κ, κ)-distributive and B\mathbb{B} is (α,2)(α, 2)-distributive for each α<κα< κ, then B\mathbb{B} is (κ,2)(κ, 2)-distributive.

preprint2014arXiv

A Lower Bound for Generalized Dominating Numbers

We show a new proof for the fact that when κκ and λλ are infinite cardinals satisfying λκ=λλ^ κ= λ, the cofinality of the set of all functions from λλ to κκ ordered by everywhere domination is 2λ2^λ. An earlier proof was a consequence of a result about independent families of functions. The new proof follows directly from the main theorem we present: for every A⊆λA \subseteq λ there is a function f:κλ→κf: {^κλ} \to κ such that whenever MM is a transitive model of ZF\textrm{ZF} such that κλ⊆M{^κλ} \subseteq M and some g:κλ→κg: {^κλ} \to κ in MM dominates ff, then A∈MA \in M. That is, "constructibility can be reduced to domination".

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.