BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Dan Haran contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
It is known that the Kurosh Subgroup Theorem does not hold for pro-$p$ groups of big cardinality. However, a subgroup $G$ of a free pro-$p$ product is projective relative to the Kurosh family of subgroups. In this paper we prove the converse of this fact.
$Θ$-Hilbertianity and its strengthening, strong $Θ$-Hilbertianity, are two generalizations of Hilbertianity inspired by Jarden's definition of $p$-Hilbertianity and strong $p$-Hilbertianity. Jarden has asked whether the two notions defined by him are actually the same. We address this question in its more general version of $Θ$-Hilbertianity and show that for PRC, and, in particular, for PAC fields, $p$-Hilbertianity and strong $p$-Hilbertianity coincide.
We introduce the condition of a profinite group being semi-free, which is more general than being free and more restrictive than being quasi-free. In particular, every projective semi-free profinite group is free. We prove that the usual permanence properties of free groups carry over to semi-free groups. Using this, we conclude that if k is a separably closed field, then many field extensions of k((x,y)) have free absolute Galois groups.