Source author record

Daisuke Kawahara

Daisuke Kawahara appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Sparse Autoencoders as Plug-and-Play Firewalls for Adversarial Attack Detection in VLMs

Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced rapidly and are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, especially with the rise of agent-based systems. However, their safety has received relatively limited attention. Even the latest proprietary and open-weight VLMs remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, leaving downstream applications exposed to significant risks. In this work, we propose a novel and lightweight adversarial attack detection framework based on sparse autoencoders (SAEs), termed SAEgis. By inserting an SAE module into a pretrained VLM and training it with standard reconstruction objectives, we find that the learned sparse latent features naturally capture attack-relevant signals. These features enable reliable classification of whether an input image has been adversarially perturbed, even for previously unseen samples. Extensive experiments show that SAEgis achieves strong performance across in-domain, cross-domain, and cross-attack settings, with particularly large improvements in cross-domain generalization compared to existing baselines. In addition, combining signals from multiple layers further improves robustness and stability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to explore SAE as a plug-and-play mechanism for adversarial attack detection in VLMs. Our method requires no additional adversarial training, introduces minimal overhead, and provides a practical approach for improving the safety of real-world VLM systems.

preprint2022arXiv

Building a Dialogue Corpus Annotated with Expressed and Experienced Emotions

In communication, a human would recognize the emotion of an interlocutor and respond with an appropriate emotion, such as empathy and comfort. Toward developing a dialogue system with such a human-like ability, we propose a method to build a dialogue corpus annotated with two kinds of emotions. We collect dialogues from Twitter and annotate each utterance with the emotion that a speaker put into the utterance (expressed emotion) and the emotion that a listener felt after listening to the utterance (experienced emotion). We built a dialogue corpus in Japanese using this method, and its statistical analysis revealed the differences between expressed and experienced emotions. We conducted experiments on recognition of the two kinds of emotions. The experimental results indicated the difficulty in recognizing experienced emotions and the effectiveness of multi-task learning of the two kinds of emotions. We hope that the constructed corpus will facilitate the study on emotion recognition in a dialogue and emotion-aware dialogue response generation.

preprint2022arXiv

Generate, Evaluate, and Select: A Dialogue System with a Response Evaluator for Diversity-Aware Response Generation

We aim to overcome the lack of diversity in responses of current dialogue systems and to develop a dialogue system that is engaging as a conversational partner. We propose a generator-evaluator model that evaluates multiple responses generated by a response generator and selects the best response by an evaluator. By generating multiple responses, we obtain diverse responses. We conduct human evaluations to compare the output of the proposed system with that of a baseline system. The results of the human evaluations showed that the proposed system's responses were often judged to be better than the baseline system's, and indicated the effectiveness of the proposed method.