Researcher profile

D. H. Burns

D. H. Burns contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Comparison of temperature and doping dependence of nematic susceptibility near a putative nematic quantum critical point

Strong electronic nematic fluctuations have been discovered near optimal doping for several families of Fe-based superconductors, motivating the search for a possible link between these fluctuations, nematic quantum criticality, and high temperature superconductivity. Here we probe a key prediction of quantum criticality, namely power law dependence of the associated nematic susceptibility as a function of composition and temperature approaching the compositionally-tuned putative quantum critical point. To probe the 'bare' quantum critical point requires suppression of the superconducting state, which we achieve by using large magnetic fields, up to 45 T, while performing elastoresistivity measurements to follow the nematic susceptibility. We performed these measurements for the prototypical electron-doped pnictide, Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$, over a dense comb of dopings. We find that close to the putative quantum critical point, the nematic susceptibility appears to obey power law behavior over almost a decade of variation in composition, consistent with basic notions of nematic quantum criticality. Paradoxically, however, we also find that the temperature dependence for compositions close to the critical value cannot be described by a single power law. This is surprising as power law scaling in both doping and temperature is expected close to a quantum critical point.