BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

D. D. Sokoloff

D. D. Sokoloff contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HEhep-phastro-ph.EP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Solar and stellar activity cycles -- no synchronization with exoplanets

Cyclic activity on the Sun and stars is primarily explained by generation of the magnetic field by a dynamo mechanism, which converts the energy of the poloidal field into the energy of the toroidal component due to differential rotation. There is, however, an alternative point of view, which explains the field generation by gravitational influence of the planetary system and, first of all, Jupiter. This hypothesis can be verified by comparing the characteristics of exoplanets with the activity variations on their associated stars. We have performed such a comparison and have drawn a negative conclusion. No relationship between the gravitational influence of the exoplanets and cycle of the host star could be found in any of the cases considered. Moreover, there are reasons to believe that a strong gravitational influence may completely eliminate cyclic variation in stellar activity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Solar and stellar flares: frequency, active regions and stellar dynamo

We demonstrate that for weak flares the dependence on spottedness can be rather weak. The fact is that such flares can occur both in small and large active regions. At the same time, powerful large flares of classes M and X occur much more often in large active regions. In energy estimates, the mean magnetic field in starspots can also be assumed equal to the mean field in the sunspot umbra. So the effective mean magnetic field is 900 Mx/cm$^2$ in sunspots and 2000 Mx/cm$^2$ in starspots. Moreover, the height of the energy storage cannot be strictly proportional to A$^{1/2}$. For stars, the fitting factor is an order of magnitude smaller. The analysis of the occurrence rate of powerful solar X-ray flares of class M and X and superflares on stars shows that, with allowance for the difference in the spottedness and compactness of active regions, both sets can be described by a single model. Thus, the problem of superflares on stars and their absence on the Sun is reduced to the problem of difference in the effectiveness of the dynamo mechanisms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cyclic variations in the main components of the solar large-scale magnetic field

We considered variations the dipole and the quadrupole components of the solar large-scale magnetic field. Both the axial and the equatorial dipoles exhibit a systematic decrease in the past four cycles in accordance with the general decrease of solar activity. The transition of the pole of a dipole from the polar region to mid latitudes occurs rather quickly, so that the longitude of the pole changes little. With time, however, this inclined dipole region shifts to larger longitudes, which suggests an acceleration of the dipole rotation. The mean rotation rate exceeds the Carrington velocity by 0.6%. The behavior of the quadrupole differs dramatically. Its decrease over last four cycles was much smaller than that of the dipole moment. The ratio of the quadrupole and dipole moments has increased for four cycles more than twice in contrast to the sunspot numbers, which displayed a twofold decrease for the same time interval. What about quadrupole rotation, the mean longitude of the poles of one sign decreased by 600 degrees over four cycles, which suggests that the mean rotation rate was lower than the Carrington velocity by 0.28%. We do not see however any conclusive evidence that, in the period under discussion, a mode of quadrupole symmetry was excited on the Sun along with the dipole mode.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Generation of strong magnetic fields in a nascent neutron star accounting for the chiral magnetic effect

We propose the mean field dynamo model for the generation of strongest magnetic fields, $B\sim 10^{15}\,{\rm G}$, in a neutron star (NS) accounting for the chiral magnetic effect (CME) driven by the shock in a supernova (SN) progenitor of that NS. The temperature jump at a narrow shock front, where an initial magnetic field existing in inflowing matter rises sharply, is the source of the CME that prevails significantly the erasure of the CME due to the spin-flip through Coulomb collisions in plasma. The growth of the magnetic field just behind the shock given by the instability term $\nabla\times (α{\bf B})$ in induction equation, stops after a successful SN explosion that throws out the mantle of a protoneutron star. As a result, such an explosion interrupts the transfer of strongly magnetized plasma from the shock onto NS surface and leads to the saturation of the magnetic field. Assuming the rigid protostar rotation, we employ the mean field dynamo, which is similar to the $α^2$-dynamo known in the standard magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). The novelty of our model is that $α^2$-dynamo is based on concepts of particle physics, applied in MHD, rather than by a mirror asymmetry of convective vortices in the rotating convection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Generation of strong magnetic fields in old neutron stars accounting for continuous chiral magnetic effect

We suggest a new mean field dynamo model in anomalous MagnetoHydroDynamics (AMHD) accounting for the mean spin (polarization) of the magnetized chiral (ultrarelativistic) plasma of a neutron star (NS). For simplicity we consider a non-superfluid NS with its rigid rotation neglecting also any matter turbulence (convection) within a star. On this way, we recover the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) as a possible source for the amplification of a seed, sufficiently strong magnetic field, $B\sim 10^{13}\,\text{G}$, up to values $B\gtrsim 10^{18}\,\text{G}$ in old NS's, having ages $t\gtrsim 10^6\,\text{yr}$. The important issue in AMHD model suggested is the continuous evolution of the chiral imbalance providing the CME for these ages, $\partial_tμ_5 (t)\neq 0$, in spite of the fast spin-flip in Coulomb collisions in the dense NS plasma that leads to vanishing $μ_5\to 0$ at an earlier epoch in the corresponding protoneutron star. In contrast to the conventional mean-field dynamos, the dynamo drivers in the model are produced due to magnetic field generated at the previous stages of stellar evolution. It makes our model basically nonlinear.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Shape of solar cycles and mid-term solar activity oscillations

The evolution of the solar activity comprises, apart from the well-known 11-year cycle, various temporal scales ranging from months up to the secondary cycles known as mid-term oscillations. Its nature deserves a physical explanation. In this work, we consider the 5-to-6 year oscillations as derived both from sunspot and from solar magnetic dipole time series. Using the solar dynamo model, we deduced that these variations may be a manifestation of the dynamo nonlinearities and non-harmonic shape of the solar activity cycles. We conclude that the observed mid-term oscillations are related to the nonlinear saturation of the dynamo processes in the solar interior.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The origin and effect of hemispheric helicity imbalance in solar dynamo

In this paper we study the effects of hemispheric imbalance of magnetic helicity density on breaking the equatorial reflection symmetry of the dynamo generated large-scale magnetic field. Our study employs the axisymmetric dynamo model which takes into account the nonlinear effect of magnetic helicity conservation. We find that the evolution of the net magnetic helicity density, in other words, the magnetic helicity imbalance, on the surface follows the evolution of the parity of the large-scale magnetic field. Random fluctuations of the $α$-effect and the helicity fluxes can inverse the causal relationship, i.e., the magnetic helicity imbalance or the imbalance of magnetic helicity fluxes can drive the magnetic parity breaking. We also found that evolution of the net magnetic helicity of the small-scale fields follows the evolution of the net magnetic helicity of the large-scale fields with some time lag. We interpret this as an effect of the difference of the magnetic helicity fluxes out of the Sun from the large and small scales.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access