BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Cyril Grunspan

Cyril Grunspan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cryptography and Securitymath.PRDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computingmath.HO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Ping-Pong Swaps

We propose Ping-Pong Swaps: A secure pure peer-to-peer crosschain swap mechanism of tokens or cryptocurrencies that does not require escrow nor an intermediate trusted third party. The only technical requirement is to be able to open unidirectional payment channels in both blockchain protocols. This allows anonymous cryptocurrency trading without the need of a centralized exchange, nor DEX's in DeFi platforms, nor multisignature escrow systems with penalties. Direct peer-to-peer crosschain swaps can be performed without a bridge platform. This enables the creation of non-custodial exchanges and also a global peer-to-peer market of pairs of tokens or cryptocurrencies. Ping-pong swaps with fiat currency is possible if banks incorporate simple payment channel functionalities. Some immediate applications are simple and fast rebalancing of Lightning Network channels, and wrapping tokens in smartchains.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Ant Routing scalability for the Lightning Network

The ambition of the Lightning Network is to provide a second layer to the Bitcoin network to enable transactions confirmed instantly, securely and anonymously with a world scale capacity using a decentralized protocol. Some of the current propositions and implementations present some difficulties in anonymity, scaling and decentalization. The Ant Routing algorithm for the Lightning Network was proposed in \cite{GrunspanPerez} for maximal decentralization, anonymity and potential scaling. It solves several problems of current implementation, such as channel information update and centralization by beacon nodes. Ant Routing nodes play all the same role and don't require any extra information on the network topology beside for their immediate neighbors. The goal of LN transactions are completed instantaneously and anonymously. We study the scaling of the Ant Routing protocol. We propose a precise implementation, with efficient memory management using AVL trees. We evaluate the efficiency of the algorithm and we estimate the memory usage of nodes by local node workload simulations. We prove that the number of transactions per second that Ant Routing can sustain is of the order of several thousands which is enough for a global payment network.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Double spend races

We correct the double spend race analysis given in Nakamoto's foundational Bitcoin article and give a closed-form formula for the probability of success of a double spend attack using the Regularized Incomplete Beta Function. We give a proof of the exponential decay on the number of confirmations, often cited in the literature, and find an asymptotic formula. Larger number of confirmations are necessary compared to those given by Nakamoto. We also compute the probability conditional to the known validation time of the blocks. This provides a finer risk analysis than the classical one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The mathematics of Bitcoin

We survey recent results on the mathematical stability of Bitcoin protocol. Profitability and probability of a double spend are estimated in closed form with classical special functions. The stability of Bitcoin mining rules is analyzed and several theorems are proved using martingale and combinatorics techniques. In particular, the empirical observation of the stability of the Bitcoin protocol is proved. This survey article on the mathematics of Bitcoin is published by the Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society, vol.115, 2020, p.31-37. Continuation of arXiv:1601.05254 (EMS Newsletter, 100, 2016 p.32).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

On Profitability of Nakamoto double spend

Nakamoto double spend strategy, described in Bitcoin foundational article, leads to total ruin with positive probability and does not make sense from the profitability point of view. The simplest strategy that can be profitable incorporates a stopping threshold when success is unlikely. We solve and compute the exact profitability for this strategy. We compute the minimal amount of the double spend that is profitable. For a given amount of the transaction, we determine the minimal number of confirmations to be requested by the recipient such that this double spend strategy is non-profitable. We find that this number of confirmations is only 1 or 2 for average transactions and a small hashrate of the attacker. This is substantially lower than the original Nakamoto numbers that are widely used and are only based on the success probability instead of the profitability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access