Source author record

Craig R. Guilbault

Craig R. Guilbault appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.GT math.GR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Group boundaries for semidirect products with Z

Bestvina's notion of a Z-structure provides a general framework for group boundaries that includes Gromov boundaries of hyperbolic groups and visual boundaries of CAT(0) groups as special cases. A refinement, known as an EZ-structure has proven useful in attacks on the Novikov Conjecture and related problems. Characterizations of groups admitting a Z- or EZ-structure are longstanding open problems. In this paper, we examine semidirect products of a group G with the integers. For example, we show that, if G is torsion-free and admits a Z-structure, then so does every semidirect product of this type. We prove a similar theorem for EZ-structures, under an additional hypothesis. As applications, we show that all closed 3-manifold groups admit Z-structures, as do all strongly polycyclic groups, and all groups of polynomial growth. In those latter two cases our Z-boundaries are always spheres. This allows one to make strong conclusions about the group cohomology and end invariants of those groups. In another direction, we expand upon the notion of an EZ-structure and discuss new applications to the Novikov Conjecture.

preprint2021arXiv

Coarse $\mathcal{Z}$-Boundaries for Groups

We generalize Bestvina's notion of a $\mathcal{Z}$-boundary for a group to that of a "coarse $\mathcal{Z}$-boundary." We show that established theorems about $\mathcal{Z}$-boundaries carry over nicely to the more general theory, and that some wished-for properties of $\mathcal{Z}$-boundaries become theorems when applied to coarse $\mathcal{Z}$-boundaries. Most notably, the property of admitting a coarse $\mathcal{Z}$-boundary is a pure quasi-isometry invariant. In the process, we streamline both new and existing definitions by introducing the notion of a "model $\mathcal{Z}$-geometry." In accordance with the existing theory, we also develop an equivariant version of the above -- that of a "coarse $E\mathcal{Z}$-boundary."

preprint2021arXiv

Ends, shapes, and boundaries in manifold topology and geometric group theory

This survey/expository article covers a variety of topics related to the "topology at infinity" of noncompact manifolds and complexes. In manifold topology and geometric group theory, the most important noncompact spaces are often contractible, so distinguishing one from another requires techniques beyond the standard tools of algebraic topology. One approach uses end invariants, such as the number of ends or the fundamental group at infinity; another approach seeks nice compactifications, then analyzes the boundaries. A thread connecting the two is shape theory. In these notes we provide a careful development of several topics: homotopy and homology properties and invariants for ends of spaces, proper maps and homotopy equivalences, tameness conditions, shapes of ends, and various types of Z-compactifications and Z-boundaries. Classical and current research from both manifold topology and geometric group theory provide the context. Along the way, many open problems are encountered. Our primary goal is casual but coherent introduction that is accessible to graduate students and also of interest to active mathematicians whose research might benefit from knowledge of these topics.

preprint2015arXiv

A Comparison of Large Scale Dimension of a Metric Space to the Dimension of its Boundary

Buyalo and Lebedeva have shown that the asymptotic dimension of a hyperbolic group is equal to the dimension of the group boundary plus one. Among the work presented here is a partial extension of that result to all groups admitting $\mathcal{Z}$-structures; in particular, we show that $\hbox{asdim}G\geq \hbox{dim}Z+1$ where $Z$ is the $\mathcal{Z}$-boundary.

preprint2015arXiv

Compacta with shapes of finite complexes: a direct approach to the Edwards-Geoghegan-Wall obstruction

An important "stability" theorem in shape theory, due to D.A. Edwards and R. Geoghegan, characterizes those compacta having the same shape as a finite CW complex. In this note we present straightforward and self-contained proof of that theorem.

preprint2013arXiv

On the dimension of Z-sets

We offer a short and elementary proof that, for a Z-set A in a finite-dimensional ANR Y, dimA<dimY. This result is relevant to the study of group boundaries. The original proof by Bestvina and Mess relied on cohomological dimension theory.

preprint2013arXiv

Weak Z-structures for some classes of groups

Motivated by the usefulness of boundaries in the study of hyperbolic and CAT(0) groups, Bestvina introduced a general approach to group boundaries via the notion of a Z-structure on a group G. Several variations on Z-structures have been studied and existence results have been obtained for some very specific classes of groups. However, little is known about the general question of which groups admit any of the various Z-structures, aside from the (easy) fact that any such G must have type F, i.e., G must admit a finite K(G,1). In fact, Bestvina has asked whether every type F group admits a Z-structure or at least a "weak" Z-structure. In this paper we prove some rather general existence theorems for weak Z-structures. Among our results are the following: Theorem A. If G is an extension of a nontrivial type F group by a nontrivial type F group, then G admits a Z-structure. Theorem B. If G admits a finite K(G,1) complex K such that the corresponding G-action on the universal cover contains a non-identity element properly homotopic to the identity, then G admits a weak Z-structure. Theorem C. If G has type F and is simply connected at infinity, then G admits a weak Z-structure.

preprint2012arXiv

Spherical alterations of handles: embedding the manifold plus construction

A key tool in our earlier work on ends of manifolds high-dimensional manifolds was an ability to embed cobordisms provided by the Quillen Plus Construction into those ends. Here we develop a `spherical modification' trick which provides a constructive approach to obtaining such embeddings. More importantly, this approach allows for more general embedding results. In this paper we develop generalizations of the plus construction and show how the corresponding cobordisms can be embedded in manifolds satisfying appropriate fundamental group properties. Results obtained here play an important role in our ongoing study of noncompact manifolds.

preprint2011arXiv

Topological properties of spaces admitting free group actions

In 1992, David Wright proved a remarkable theorem about which contractible open manifolds are covering spaces. He showed that if a one-ended open manifold M has pro-monomorphic fundamental group at infinity which is not pro-trivial and is not stably Z, then M does not cover any manifold (except itself). In the non-manifold case, Wright's method showed that when a one-ended, simply connected, locally compact ANR X with pro-monomorphic fundamental group at infinity admits an action of Z by covering transformations then the fundamental group at infinity of X is (up to pro-isomorphism) an inverse sequence of finitely generated free groups. We improve upon this latter result, by showing that X must have a stable finitely generated free fundamental group at infinity. Simple examples show that a free group of any finite rank is possible. We also prove that if X (as above), admits a non-cocompact action of Z+Z by covering transformations, then X is simply connected at infinity. Corollary: Every finitely presented one-ended group G which contains an element of infinite order satisfies exactly one of the following: 1) G is simply connected at infinity; 2) G is virtually a surface group; 3) The fundamental group at infinity of G is not pro-monomorphic. Our methods also provide a quick new proof of Wright's open manifold theorem.