BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Corwin Sinnamon

Corwin Sinnamon contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Simpler Proof that Pairing Heaps Take O(1) Amortized Time per Insertion

The pairing heap is a simple "self-adjusting" implementation of a heap (priority queue). Inserting an item into a pairing heap or decreasing the key of an item takes O(1) time worst-case, as does melding two heaps. But deleting an item of minimum key can take time linear in the heap size in the worst case. The paper that introduced the pairing heap proved an O(log n) amortized time bound for each heap operation, where n is the number of items in the heap or heaps involved in the operation, by charging all but O(log n) of the time for each deletion to non-deletion operations, O(log n) to each. Later Iacono found a way to reduce the amortized time per insertion to O(1) and that of meld to zero while preserving the O(log n) amortized time bound for the other update operations. We give a simpler proof of Iacono's result with significantly smaller constant factors. Our analysis uses the natural representation of pairing heaps instead of the conversion to a binary tree used in the original analysis and in Iacono's.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Fast and Simple Edge-Coloring Algorithms

We develop sequential algorithms for constructing edge-colorings of graphs and multigraphs efficiently and using few colors. Our primary focus is edge-coloring arbitrary simple graphs using $d+1$ colors, where $d$ is the largest vertex degree in the graph. Vizing's Theorem states that every simple graph can be edge-colored using $d+1$ colors. Although some graphs can be edge-colored using only $d$ colors, it is NP-hard to recognize graphs of this type [Holyer, 1981]. So using $d+1$ colors is a natural goal. Efficient techniques for $(d+1)$-edge-coloring were developed by Gabow, Nishizeki, Kariv, Leven, and Terada in 1985, and independently by Arjomandi in 1982, leading to algorithms that run in $O(|E| \sqrt{|V| \log |V|})$ time. They have remained the fastest known algorithms for this task. We improve the runtime to $O(|E| \sqrt{|V|})$ with a small modification and careful analysis. We then develop a randomized version of the algorithm that is much simpler to implement and has the same asymptotic runtime, with very high probability. On the way to these results, we give a simple algorithm for $(2d-1)$-edge-coloring of multigraphs that runs in $O(|E|\log d)$ time. Underlying these algorithms is a general edge-coloring strategy which may lend itself to further applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Space-Efficient Data Structures for Lattices

A lattice is a partially-ordered set in which every pair of elements has a unique meet (greatest lower bound) and join (least upper bound). We present new data structures for lattices that are simple, efficient, and nearly optimal in terms of space complexity. Our first data structure can answer partial order queries in constant time and find the meet or join of two elements in $O(n^{3/4})$ time, where $n$ is the number of elements in the lattice. It occupies $O(n^{3/2}\log n)$ bits of space, which is only a $Θ(\log n)$ factor from the $Θ(n^{3/2})$-bit lower bound for storing lattices. The preprocessing time is $O(n^2)$. This structure admits a simple space-time tradeoff so that, for any $c \in [\frac{1}{2}, 1]$, the data structure supports meet and join queries in $O(n^{1-c/2})$ time, occupies $O(n^{1+c}\log n)$ bits of space, and can be constructed in $O(n^2 + n^{1+3c/2})$ time. Our second data structure uses $O(n^{3/2}\log n)$ bits of space and supports meet and join in $O(d \frac{\log n}{\log d})$ time, where $d$ is the maximum degree of any element in the transitive reduction graph of the lattice. This structure is much faster for lattices with low-degree elements. This paper also identifies an error in a long-standing solution to the problem of representing lattices. We discuss the issue with this previous work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access