BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Constantin Rothkopf

Constantin Rothkopf appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer VisionMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceHuman-Computer Interaction

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Alfie: An Interactive Robot with a Moral Compass

This work introduces Alfie, an interactive robot that is capable of answering moral (deontological) questions of a user. The interaction of Alfie is designed in a way in which the user can offer an alternative answer when the user disagrees with the given answer so that Alfie can learn from its interactions. Alfie's answers are based on a sentence embedding model that uses state-of-the-art language models, e.g. Universal Sentence Encoder and BERT. Alfie is implemented on a Furhat Robot, which provides a customizable user interface to design a social robot.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Model-driven Simulations for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

The use of simulated virtual environments to train deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) is a currently active practice to reduce the (real)data-hungriness of the deep CNN models, especially in application domains in which large scale real data and/or groundtruth acquisition is difficult or laborious. Recent approaches have attempted to harness the capabilities of existing video games, animated movies to provide training data with high precision groundtruth. However, a stumbling block is in how one can certify generalization of the learned models and their usefulness in real world data sets. This opens up fundamental questions such as: What is the role of photorealism of graphics simulations in training CNN models? Are the trained models valid in reality? What are possible ways to reduce the performance bias? In this work, we begin to address theses issues systematically in the context of urban semantic understanding with CNNs. Towards this end, we (a) propose a simple probabilistic urban scene model, (b) develop a parametric rendering tool to synthesize the data with groundtruth, followed by (c) a systematic exploration of the impact of level-of-realism on the generality of the trained CNN model to real world; and domain adaptation concepts to minimize the performance bias.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Model Validation for Vision Systems via Graphics Simulation

Rapid advances in computation, combined with latest advances in computer graphics simulations have facilitated the development of vision systems and training them in virtual environments. One major stumbling block is in certification of the designs and tuned parameters of these systems to work in real world. In this paper, we begin to explore the fundamental question: Which type of information transfer is more analogous to real world? Inspired from the performance characterization methodology outlined in the 90's, we note that insights derived from simulations can be qualitative or quantitative depending on the degree of the fidelity of models used in simulations and the nature of the questions posed by the experimenter. We adapt the methodology in the context of current graphics simulation tools for modeling data generation processes and, for systematic performance characterization and trade-off analysis for vision system design leading to qualitative and quantitative insights. In concrete, we examine invariance assumptions used in vision algorithms for video surveillance settings as a case study and assess the degree to which those invariance assumptions deviate as a function of contextual variables on both graphics simulations and in real data. As computer graphics rendering quality improves, we believe teasing apart the degree to which model assumptions are valid via systematic graphics simulation can be a significant aid to assisting more principled ways of approaching vision system design and performance modeling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Simulations for Validation of Vision Systems

As the computer vision matures into a systems science and engineering discipline, there is a trend in leveraging latest advances in computer graphics simulations for performance evaluation, learning, and inference. However, there is an open question on the utility of graphics simulations for vision with apparently contradicting views in the literature. In this paper, we place the results from the recent literature in the context of performance characterization methodology outlined in the 90's and note that insights derived from simulations can be qualitative or quantitative depending on the degree of fidelity of models used in simulation and the nature of the question posed by the experimenter. We describe a simulation platform that incorporates latest graphics advances and use it for systematic performance characterization and trade-off analysis for vision system design. We verify the utility of the platform in a case study of validating a generative model inspired vision hypothesis, Rank-Order consistency model, in the contexts of global and local illumination changes, and bad weather, and high-frequency noise. Our approach establishes the link between alternative viewpoints, involving models with physics based semantics and signal and perturbation semantics and confirms insights in literature on robust change detection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Bayesian multitask inverse reinforcement learning

We generalise the problem of inverse reinforcement learning to multiple tasks, from multiple demonstrations. Each one may represent one expert trying to solve a different task, or as different experts trying to solve the same task. Our main contribution is to formalise the problem as statistical preference elicitation, via a number of structured priors, whose form captures our biases about the relatedness of different tasks or expert policies. In doing so, we introduce a prior on policy optimality, which is more natural to specify. We show that our framework allows us not only to learn to efficiently from multiple experts but to also effectively differentiate between the goals of each. Possible applications include analysing the intrinsic motivations of subjects in behavioural experiments and learning from multiple teachers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Preference elicitation and inverse reinforcement learning

We state the problem of inverse reinforcement learning in terms of preference elicitation, resulting in a principled (Bayesian) statistical formulation. This generalises previous work on Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning and allows us to obtain a posterior distribution on the agent's preferences, policy and optionally, the obtained reward sequence, from observations. We examine the relation of the resulting approach to other statistical methods for inverse reinforcement learning via analysis and experimental results. We show that preferences can be determined accurately, even if the observed agent's policy is sub-optimal with respect to its own preferences. In that case, significantly improved policies with respect to the agent's preferences are obtained, compared to both other methods and to the performance of the demonstrated policy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access