Source author record

Constantin A. Rothkopf

Constantin A. Rothkopf appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language cs.CY Neurons and Cognition

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

5topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Fodor and Pylyshyn's Legacy: Still No Human-like Systematic Compositionality in Neural Networks

Strong meta-learning capabilities for systematic compositionality are emerging as an important skill for navigating the complex and changing tasks of today's world. However, in presenting models for robust adaptation to novel environments, it is important to refrain from making unsupported claims about the performance of meta-learning systems that ultimately do not stand up to scrutiny. While Fodor and Pylyshyn famously posited that neural networks inherently lack this capacity as they are unable to model compositional representations or structure-sensitive operations, and thus are not a viable model of the human mind, Lake and Baroni recently presented meta-learning as a pathway to compositionality. In this position paper, we critically revisit this claim and highlight limitations in the proposed meta-learning framework for compositionality. Our analysis shows that modern neural meta-learning systems can only perform such tasks, if at all, under a very narrow and restricted definition of a meta-learning setup. We therefore claim that `Fodor and Pylyshyn's legacy' persists, and to date, there is no human-like systematic compositionality learned in neural networks.

preprint2022arXiv

Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Do

Artificial writing is permeating our lives due to recent advances in large-scale, transformer-based language models (LMs) such as BERT, its variants, GPT-2/3, and others. Using them as pre-trained models and fine-tuning them for specific tasks, researchers have extended state of the art for many NLP tasks and shown that they capture not only linguistic knowledge but also retain general knowledge implicitly present in the data. Unfortunately, LMs trained on unfiltered text corpora suffer from degenerated and biased behaviour. While this is well established, we show that recent LMs also contain human-like biases of what is right and wrong to do, some form of ethical and moral norms of the society -- they bring a "moral direction" to surface. That is, we show that these norms can be captured geometrically by a direction, which can be computed, e.g., by a PCA, in the embedding space, reflecting well the agreement of phrases to social norms implicitly expressed in the training texts and providing a path for attenuating or even preventing toxic degeneration in LMs. Being able to rate the (non-)normativity of arbitrary phrases without explicitly training the LM for this task, we demonstrate the capabilities of the "moral direction" for guiding (even other) LMs towards producing normative text and showcase it on RealToxicityPrompts testbed, preventing the neural toxic degeneration in GPT-2.

preprint2021arXiv

Inferring perceptual decision making parameters from behavior in production and reproduction tasks

Bayesian models of behavior have provided computational level explanations in a range of psychophysical tasks. One fundamental experimental paradigm is the production or reproduction task, in which subjects are instructed to generate an action that either reproduces a previously sensed stimulus magnitude or achieves a target response. This type of task therefore distinguishes itself from other psychophysical tasks in that the responses are on a continuum and effort plays an important role with increasing response magnitude. Based on Bayesian decision theory we present an inference method to recover perceptual uncertainty, response variability, and the cost function underlying human responses. Crucially, the cost function is parameterized such that effort is explicitly included. We present a hybrid inference method employing MCMC sampling utilizing appropriate proposal distributions and an inner loop utilizing amortized inference with a neural network that approximates the mode of the optimal response distribution. We show how this model can be utilized to avoid unidentifiability of experimental designs and that parameters can be recovered through validation on synthetic and application to experimental data. Our approach will enable behavioral scientists to perform Bayesian inference of decision making parameters in production and reproduction tasks.