Source author record

Cindy M. Grimm

Cindy M. Grimm appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

An autonomous robot for pruning modern, planar fruit trees

Dormant pruning of fruit trees is an important task for maintaining tree health and ensuring high-quality fruit. Due to decreasing labor availability, pruning is a prime candidate for robotic automation. However, pruning also represents a uniquely difficult problem for robots, requiring robust systems for perception, pruning point determination, and manipulation that must operate under variable lighting conditions and in complex, highly unstructured environments. In this paper, we introduce a system for pruning sweet cherry trees (in a planar tree architecture called an upright fruiting offshoot configuration) that integrates various subsystems from our previous work on perception and manipulation. The resulting system is capable of operating completely autonomously and requires minimal control of the environment. We validate the performance of our system through field trials in a sweet cherry orchard, ultimately achieving a cutting success rate of 58%. Though not fully robust and requiring improvements in throughput, our system is the first to operate on fruit trees and represents a useful base platform to be improved in the future.

preprint2016arXiv

Human-Planned Robotic Grasp Ranges: Capture and Validation

Leveraging human grasping skills to teach a robot to perform a manipulation task is appealing, but there are several limitations to this approach: time-inefficient data capture procedures, limited generalization of the data to other grasps and objects, and inability to use that data to learn more about how humans perform and evaluate grasps. This paper presents a data capture protocol that partially addresses these deficiencies by asking participants to specify ranges over which a grasp is valid. The protocol is verified both qualitatively through online survey questions (where 95.38% of within-range grasps are identified correctly with the nearest extreme grasp) and quantitatively by showing that there is small variation in grasps ranges from different participants as measured by joint angles, contact points, and position. We demonstrate that these grasp ranges are valid through testing on a physical robot (93.75% of grasps interpolated from grasp ranges are successful).