BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Chun-Fang Li

Chun-Fang Li appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
physics.opticsquant-phcond-mat.mes-hallphysics.class-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

18works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

18 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

From Poynting vector to new degree of freedom of polarization

Up till now, the Jones vector is, strictly speaking, only a notion about the state of polarization of plane electromagnetic waves though it is generally applied to paraxial fields approximately. Here we generalize it to non-paraxial fields. The same as the Jones vector for plane waves, the generalized Jones vector for non-paraxial fields is global in the sense that it does not depend on the field position. This is achieved by investigating the effect of the polarization on the Poynting vector in the non-paraxial superposition of four plane waves. Even more importantly, by doing so we find that in addition to the Jones vector, another degree of freedom, called the Stratton vector, is also needed to completely describe the state of polarization of non-paraxial fields. It is shown that the polarization described by the global Jones vector is dependent on the position. The position dependence of the polarization originates in the position dependence of the polarization bases. The Stratton vector specifies the way in which the polarization bases depend on the position. A general expression for the dependence of the Poynting vector on the Stratton and Jones vectors is also given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Are vector vortex beams endowed with any entanglement?

Polarization of light beams is one of the most important physical phenomena. But up till now it was only described in the paraxial approximation in which it is considered to be a single degree of freedom that is characterized by the local Stokes parameters over the transverse plane. Based on such a description, vector vortex beams are considered to be entangled in polarization and spatial mode. Here we show that there is not any entanglement in a large class of representative vector vortex beams, including the well-known cylindrical-vector beams. This is achieved by developing an approach to exactly characterize the polarization of a general beam. It is found that the Stokes parameters, when generalized rigorously to a general beam in momentum space, are physical quantities with respect to a natural coordinate system. The so-called Stratton vector determining the natural coordinate system fixes a natural representation for the polarization in which the Pauli matrices represent the intrinsic degree of freedom of the polarization with respect to the natural coordinate system. As a result, the Stratton vector itself shows up as another degree of freedom of the polarization. From this point of view, the light beams specified by a Stratton vector parallel to the propagation axis as well as by the eigenvalues of the Pauli matrix $\hatσ_1$ are precisely vector vortex beams. They are not endowed with any entanglement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Deriving photon spin from relativistic quantum equations: Nonlocality of photon spin and relativistic quantum constraint

The difficulties encountered up till now in the theory of identifying the spin and orbital angular momentum of the photon stem from the approach of dividing the angular momentum of the photon into spin and orbital parts. Here we derive the spin of the photon from a set of two relativistic quantum equations that was first cast from the free-space Maxwell equations by Darwin in 1932. Much attention is focused on the nonlocal properties of the photon spin that are determined by the relativistic quantum constraint, one of the so-called Darwin equations. Meanwhile, we point out that for the Darwin equations to describe the quantum motion of the photon, the upper and lower parts of the wavefunction cannot be the electric and magnetic fields as Darwin prescribed. Their nonlocal relations are investigated. The Lorentz covariance of the Darwin equations is also proven, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New mechanism for polarization singularity of vector vortex beams

It was recently realized that the polarization bases of the plane-wave modes in the integral representation of a light beam need to be determined by a degree of freedom arising from the divergence-free Maxwell's equation. This is a frequently introduced real unit vector in the literature, called Stratton vector. The polarization bases so determined are singular at the momentum that is parallel to the Stratton vector. Here we show that the polarization singularity of vector vortex beams given by the integral representation comes from the singularity of the polarization bases in association with the Stratton vector. The consistency of the polarization structure of the vector vortex beams with their polarization bases is also discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Degree of diffraction for monochromatic light beams

A parameter, called the degree of diffraction, is defined to describe the diffractive spreading of a monochromatic light beam. The same as the degree of paraxiality that was introduced by Gawhary and Severini in Opt. Lett. 33, 1360 (2008), the degree of diffraction depends only on beam's angular spectrum. With this definition, it is possible to quantitatively compare the diffractive spreading of different light beams.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On angular momentum of photons: the role of transversality condition in quantum mechanics

Whether the total angular momentum of the photon can be separated into spin and orbital parts has been a long-standing problem due to the constraint of transversality condition on its vector wavefunction. A careful analysis shows that the situation arises from a misuse of the constraint in quantum mechanics. To use the constraint properly, we convert the vector representation into a two-component representation in which the wavefunction is not constrained by any conditions. Upon doing so, we not only separate the spin conceptually from the orbital angular momentum but also identify the Berry gauge in which the two-component wavefunction can be canonically quantized. A corollary is that only in one particular Berry gauge can a radiation field be canonically quantized in terms of the plane waves. The degree of freedom to fix the Berry gauge, which reflects a symmetry of the constraint, turns out to have observable quantum effects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Orbital angular momentum is dependent on polarization

It is shown that the momentum density of free electromagnetic field splits into two parts. One has no contribution to the net momentum due to the transversality condition. The other yields all the momentum. The angular momentum that originates from the former part is spin, and the angular momentum that originates from the latter part is orbital angular momentum. Expressions for the spin and orbital angular momentum are given in terms of the electric vector in reciprocal space. The spin and orbital angular momentum defined this way are used to investigate the angular momentum of nonparaxial beams that are described in a recently published paper [Phys. Rev. A 78, 063831 (2008)]. It is found that the orbital angular momentum depends, apart from an $l$-dependent term, on two global quantities, the polarization represented by a generalized Jones vector and a new characteristic represented by a unit vector $\mathbf{I}$, though the spin depends only on the polarization. The polarization dependence of orbital angular momentum through the effect of $\mathbf{I}$ is obtained and discussed. Some applications of the result obtained here are also made. The fact that the spin originates from the part of momentum density that has no contribution to the net momentum is used to show that there does not exist the paradox on the spin of circularly polarized plane wave. The polarization dependence of both spin and orbital angular momentum is shown to be the origin of conversion from the spin of a paraxial Laguerre-Gaussian beam into the orbital angular momentum of the focused beam through a high numerical aperture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Representation theory for vector electromagnetic beams

A representation theory of finite electromagnetic beams in free space is formulated by factorizing the field vector of the plane-wave component into a $3 \times 2$ mapping matrix and a 2-component Jones-like vector. The mapping matrix has one degree of freedom that can be described by the azimuthal angle of a fixed unit vector with respect to the wave vector. This degree of freedom allows us to find out such a beam solution in which every plane-wave component is specified by the same fixed unit vector $\mathbf{I}$ and has the same normalized Jones-like vector. The angle $θ_I$ between the fixed unit vector and the propagation axis acts as a parameter that describes the vectorial property of the beam. The impact of $θ_I$ is investigated on a beam of angular-spectrum field scalar that is independent of the azimuthal angle. The field vector in position space is calculated in the first-order approximation under the paraxial condition. A transverse effect is found that a beam of elliptically-polarized angular spectrum is displaced from the center in the direction that is perpendicular to the plane formed by the fixed unit vector and the propagation axis. The expression of the transverse displacement is obtained. Its paraxial approximation is also given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On photon angular momentum: transversality condition, Berry degree of freedom, and non-commutativity of photon position

Different from the usual conclusion that the separation of the photon angular momentum into orbital and spin parts is physically meaningless, the orbital and spin angular momenta are demonstrated in the first-quantization framework not to satisfy the standard commutation relation. It is shown on the basis of the transversality condition that the spin is aligned with the propagation direction so that only the helicity can be the intrinsic degree of freedom. It is also shown on the same basis that only in the so-called intrinsic reference system does the helicity behave intrinsic. The intrinsic reference system of the photon is determined by the "action" of a gauge potential, the Berry potential, on the helicity of the photon. The Berry potential is fixed by a vector-valued degree of freedom, called the Berry degree of freedom. Because only the position of the photon in its intrinsic reference system is canonically conjugate to the momentum, the intrinsic reference system itself is endowed with quantum effects that depend on the Berry degree of freedom as well as the helicity. This not only explains the so-called spin Hall effect of light but also helps to understand why the total angular momentum cannot be generally split into helicity-independent orbital and helicity-dependent spin parts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Electronic analogy of Goos-Hänchen effect: a review

The analogies between optical and electronic Goos-Hänchen effects are established based on electron wave optics in semiconductor or graphene-based nanostructures. In this paper, we give a brief overview of the progress achieved so far in the field of electronic Goos-Hänchen shifts, and show the relevant optical analogies. In particular, we present several theoretical results on the giant positive and negative Goos-Hänchen shifts in various semiconductor or graphen-based nanostructures, their controllability, and potential applications in electronic devices, e.g. spin (or valley) beam splitters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On the angular momentum of photons: effects of transversality condition on the quantization of radiation fields

The notion of intrinsic system of coordinates is introduced for the photon from the constraint of transversality condition. The degree of freedom to specify the intrinsic system is extracted from the same constraint, which turns out to be responsible for the spin Hall effect of light. It is shown that the fundamental quantization conditions that break down in the laboratory system of coordinates restore in the intrinsic system, which make it realizable to canonically quantize the radiation field. It is also shown that the dependence of the intrinsic system on the momentum underlies the noncommutativity of photon position in the laboratory system. The commutation relations of the spin and orbital angular momentum that were found by van Enk and Nienhuis [J. Mod. Opt. \textbf{41}, 963 (1994)] in a second quantized theory are re-derived in the present first quantized theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Controllable Goos-Hänchen shifts and spin beam splitter for ballistic electrons in a parabolic quantum well under a uniform magnetic field

The quantum Goos-Hänchen shift for ballistic electrons is investigated in a parabolic potential well under a uniform vertical magnetic field. It is found that the Goos-Hänchen shift can be negative as well as positive, and becomes zero at transmission resonances. The beam shift depends not only on the incident energy and incidence angle, but also on the magnetic field and Landau quantum number. Based on these phenomena, we propose an alternative way to realize the spin beam splitter in the proposed spintronic device, which can completely separate spin-up and spin-down electron beams by negative and positive Goos-Hänchen shifts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A unit vector for characterizing the spin polarization of free electron

New degrees of freedom having the form of a unit vector are identified for characterizing the spin polarization of free electron. It is shown that when only the spin is considered, the non-commutativity of the Cartesian components of the Pauli vector allows us to use the azimuthal angle of a second direction, denoted by unit vector $\mathbf I$, with respect to the quantization direction to characterize the spin polarization. The rotation of $\mathbf I$ through an angle about the quantization axis leads to a rotation of the spin polarization vector through twice the angle about the same axis. Discussions are also made in Heisenberg picture as well. Upon utilizing this approach to a free electron and letting the quantization direction for each plane wave be the wave vector, we arrive at a representation in which the unit vector $\mathbf I$ functions as an independent index to characterize the spin polarization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Photon spin operator and Pauli matrix

Any polarization vector of a plane wave can be decomposed into a pair of mutually orthogonal base vectors, known as a polarization basis. Regarding this decomposition as a quasi-unitary transformation from a three-component vector to a corresponding two-component spinor, one is led to a representation formalism for the photon spin. The spin operator $\hat{\boldsymbol γ}$ defined on the space of unit spinors, referred to as the Jones space, has only component along the wave vector and is represented by one of the Pauli matrices in the commonly used polarization basis. It is deformed by the quasi-unitary transformation from the spin operator that is defined on the space of unit polarization vectors, referred to as the Pancharatnam space. On the basis of this theory, it is shown that the Cartesian components of spin operator $\hat{\boldsymbol γ}$ are mutually commutative and the spin angular momentum in units of $\hbar$ is exactly the component of the Stokes vector along the wave vector.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Angular momentum of non-paraxial light beam: Dependence of orbital angular momentum on polarization

It is shown that the momentum density of free electromagnetic field splits into two parts. One has no contribution to the net momentum due to the transversality condition. The other yields all the momentum. The angular momentum that is associated with the former part is spin, and the angular momentum that is associated with the latter part is orbital angular momentum. Expressions for the spin and orbital angular momentum are given in terms of the electric vector in reciprocal space. The spin and orbital angular momentum defined this way are used to investigate the angular momentum of nonparaxial beams that are described in a recently published paper [Phys. Rev. A 78, 063831 (2008)]. It is found that the orbital angular momentum depends, apart from an $l$-dependent term, on two global quantities, the polarization represented by a generalized Jones vector and a new characteristic represented by a unit vector $\mathbf{I}$, though the spin depends only on the polarization. The polarization dependence of orbital angular momentum through the impact of $\mathbf{I}$ is obtained and discussed. Some applications of the result obtained here are also made. The fact that the spin originates from the momentum density that has no contribution to the net momentum is used to show that there does not exist the paradox on the spin of circularly polarized plane wave. The polarization dependence of both spin and orbital angular momentum is shown to be the origin of conversion from the spin of a paraxial Laguerre-Gaussian beam into the orbital angular momentum of the focused beam through a high numerical aperture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access