BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Chulin Xie

Chulin Xie contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningCryptography and Security

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

UniFed: All-In-One Federated Learning Platform to Unify Open-Source Frameworks

Federated Learning (FL) has become a practical and widely adopted distributed learning paradigm. However, the lack of a comprehensive and standardized solution covering diverse use cases makes it challenging to use in practice. In addition, selecting an appropriate FL framework for a specific use case can be a daunting task. In this work, we present UniFed, the first unified platform for standardizing existing open-source FL frameworks. The platform streamlines the end-to-end workflow for distributed experimentation and deployment, encompassing 11 popular open-source FL frameworks. In particular, to address the substantial variations in workflows and data formats, UniFed introduces a configuration-based schema-enforced task specification, offering 20 editable fields. UniFed also provides functionalities such as distributed execution management, logging, and data analysis. With UniFed, we evaluate and compare 11 popular FL frameworks from the perspectives of functionality, privacy protection, and performance, through conducting developer surveys and code-level investigation. We collect 15 diverse FL scenario setups (e.g., horizontal and vertical settings) for FL framework evaluation. This comprehensive evaluation allows us to analyze both model and system performance, providing detailed comparisons and offering recommendations for framework selection. UniFed simplifies the process of selecting and utilizing the appropriate FL framework for specific use cases, while enabling standardized distributed experimentation and deployment. Our results and analysis based on experiments with up to 178 distributed nodes provide valuable system design and deployment insights, aiming to empower practitioners in their pursuit of effective FL solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Unraveling the Connections between Privacy and Certified Robustness in Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks

Federated learning (FL) provides an efficient paradigm to jointly train a global model leveraging data from distributed users. As local training data comes from different users who may not be trustworthy, several studies have shown that FL is vulnerable to poisoning attacks. Meanwhile, to protect the privacy of local users, FL is usually trained in a differentially private way (DPFL). Thus, in this paper, we ask: What are the underlying connections between differential privacy and certified robustness in FL against poisoning attacks? Can we leverage the innate privacy property of DPFL to provide certified robustness for FL? Can we further improve the privacy of FL to improve such robustness certification? We first investigate both user-level and instance-level privacy of FL and provide formal privacy analysis to achieve improved instance-level privacy. We then provide two robustness certification criteria: certified prediction and certified attack inefficacy for DPFL on both user and instance levels. Theoretically, we provide the certified robustness of DPFL based on both criteria given a bounded number of adversarial users or instances. Empirically, we conduct extensive experiments to verify our theories under a range of poisoning attacks on different datasets. We find that increasing the level of privacy protection in DPFL results in stronger certified attack inefficacy; however, it does not necessarily lead to a stronger certified prediction. Thus, achieving the optimal certified prediction requires a proper balance between privacy and utility loss.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Privacy of Autonomous Vehicles: Risks, Protection Methods, and Future Directions

Recent advances in machine learning have enabled its wide application in different domains, and one of the most exciting applications is autonomous vehicles (AVs), which have encouraged the development of a number of ML algorithms from perception to prediction to planning. However, training AVs usually requires a large amount of training data collected from different driving environments (e.g., cities) as well as different types of personal information (e.g., working hours and routes). Such collected large data, treated as the new oil for ML in the data-centric AI era, usually contains a large amount of privacy-sensitive information which is hard to remove or even audit. Although existing privacy protection approaches have achieved certain theoretical and empirical success, there is still a gap when applying them to real-world applications such as autonomous vehicles. For instance, when training AVs, not only can individually identifiable information reveal privacy-sensitive information, but also population-level information such as road construction within a city, and proprietary-level commercial secrets of AVs. Thus, it is critical to revisit the frontier of privacy risks and corresponding protection approaches in AVs to bridge this gap. Following this goal, in this work, we provide a new taxonomy for privacy risks and protection methods in AVs, and we categorize privacy in AVs into three levels: individual, population, and proprietary. We explicitly list out recent challenges to protect each of these levels of privacy, summarize existing solutions to these challenges, discuss the lessons and conclusions, and provide potential future directions and opportunities for both researchers and practitioners. We believe this work will help to shape the privacy research in AV and guide the privacy protection technology design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Attack-Resistant Federated Learning with Residual-based Reweighting

Federated learning has a variety of applications in multiple domains by utilizing private training data stored on different devices. However, the aggregation process in federated learning is highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks so that the global model may behave abnormally under attacks. To tackle this challenge, we present a novel aggregation algorithm with residual-based reweighting to defend federated learning. Our aggregation algorithm combines repeated median regression with the reweighting scheme in iteratively reweighted least squares. Our experiments show that our aggregation algorithm outperforms other alternative algorithms in the presence of label-flipping and backdoor attacks. We also provide theoretical analysis for our aggregation algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access