Researcher profile

Christopher M. Baker

Christopher M. Baker contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

From climate change to pandemics: decision science can help scientists have impact

Scientific knowledge and advances are a cornerstone of modern society. They improve our understanding of the world we live in and help us navigate global challenges including emerging infectious diseases, climate change and the biodiversity crisis. For any scientist, whether they work primarily in fundamental knowledge generation or in the applied sciences, it is important to understand how science fits into a decision-making framework. Decision science is a field that aims to pinpoint evidence-based management strategies. It provides a framework for scientists to directly impact decisions or to understand how their work will fit into a decision process. Decision science is more than undertaking targeted and relevant scientific research or providing tools to assist policy makers; it is an approach to problem formulation, bringing together mathematical modelling, stakeholder values and logistical constraints to support decision making. In this paper we describe decision science, its use in different contexts, and highlight current gaps in methodology and application. The COVID-19 pandemic has thrust mathematical models into the public spotlight, but it is one of innumerable examples in which modelling informs decision making. Other examples include models of storm systems (eg. cyclones, hurricanes) and climate change. Although the decision timescale in these examples differs enormously (from hours to decades), the underlying decision science approach is common across all problems. Bridging communication gaps between different groups is one of the greatest challenges for scientists. However, by better understanding and engaging with the decision-making processes, scientists will have greater impact and make stronger contributions to important societal problems.

preprint2020arXiv

A continuous time formulation of stochastic dual control to avoid the curse of dimensionality

Dual control denotes a class of control problems where the parameters governing the system are imperfectly known. The challenge is to find the optimal balance between probing, i.e. exciting the system to understand it more, and caution, i.e. selecting conservative controls based on current knowledge to achieve the control objective. Dynamic programming techniques can achieve this optimal trade-off. However, while dynamic programming performs well with discrete state and time, it is not well-suited to problems with continuous time-frames or continuous or unbounded state spaces. Another limitation is that multidimensional states often cause the dynamic programming approaches to be intractable. In this paper, we investigate whether continuous-time optimal control tools could help circumvent these caveats whilst still achieving the probing-caution balance. We introduce a stylized problem where the state is governed by one of two differential equations. It is initially unknown which differential equation governs the system, so we must simultaneously determine the true differential equation and control the system to the desired state. We show how this problem can be transformed to apply optimal control tools, and compare the performance of this approach to a dynamic programming approach. Our results suggest that the optimal control algorithm rivals dynamic programming on small problems, achieving the right balance between aggressive and smoothly varying controls. In contrast to dynamic programming, the optimal control approach remains tractable when several states are to be controlled simultaneously.