BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Christian Pipper

Christian Pipper contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologymath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A non-parametric approach for estimating the correlation between log-rank test statistics with applications to a conjunctive power calculation

We present a method for estimating the correlation between log-rank test statistics evaluating separate null hypotheses for two time-to-event endpoints. The correlation is estimated using subject-level data by a non-parametric approach based on the independent and identically distributed (iid) decomposition of the log-rank test statistic under any alternative. Using the iid decomposition, we are able to make an assumption-lean estimation of the correlation. A motivating example using the developed approach is provided. Here, we illustrate how the suggested approach can be used to give a realistic quantification of expected conjunctive power that can guide the design of a new randomized clinical trial using historical data. Finally, we investigate the method's finite sample properties via a simulation study that confirms unbiased and consistent behavior of the proposed approach. In addition, the simulation study gives insight into the effects of censoring on the correlation between the log-rank test statistics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Properties of a confirmatory two-stage adaptive procedure for assessing average bioequivalence

We investigate a confirmatory two stage adaptive procedure for assessing average bioequivalence and provide some insights to its theoretical properties. Effectively, we perform Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) to reach overall decision about each of the two traditional null-hypotheses involved in declaring average bioequivalence. The tests are performed as combination tests separately for each hypothesis based on the corresponding pair of stagewise p-values. Features of the procedure include a built in futility, sample size reassessment, and the ability to simultaneously assess average bioequivalence with respect to multiple endpoints while controlling the familywise error rate. To facilitate inference at the end of a trial we also derive overall confidence limits that match the decision reached on each one sided hypothesis and provide theory ensuring their appropriateness. The performance is assessed by simulation in the context of planning a study to compare two different administrations of a biologic treatment of atopic dermatitis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Unbiased and Efficient Estimation of Causal Treatment Effects in Cross-over Trials

We introduce causal inference reasoning to cross-over trials, with a focus on Thorough QT (TQT) studies. For such trials, we propose different sets of assumptions and consider their impact on the modelling strategy and estimation procedure. We show that unbiased estimates of a causal treatment effect are obtained by a G-computation approach in combination with weighted least squares predictions from a working regression model. Only a few natural requirements on the working regression and weighting matrix are needed for the result to hold. It follows that a large class of Gaussian linear mixed working models lead to unbiased estimates of a causal treatment effect, even if they do not capture the true data generating mechanism. We compare a range of working regression models in a simulation study where data are simulated from a complex data generating mechanism with input parameters estimated on a real TQT data set. In this setting, we find that for all practical purposes working models adjusting for baseline QTc measurements have comparable performance. Specifically, this is observed for working models that are by default too simplistic to capture the true data generating mechanism. Cross-over trials and particularly TQT studies can be analysed efficiently using simple working regression models without biasing the estimates for the causal parameters of interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access