Researcher profile

Christian Konrad

Christian Konrad contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Improved Weighted Matching in the Sliding Window Model

We consider the Maximum-weight Matching (MWM) problem in the streaming sliding window model of computation. In this model, the input consists of a sequence of weighted edges on a given vertex set $V$ of size $n$. The objective is to maintain an approximation of a maximum-weight matching in the graph spanned by the $L$ most recent edges, for some integer $L$, using as little space as possible. Prior to our work, the state-of-the-art results were a $(3.5+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for MWM by Biabani et al. [ISAAC'21] and a $(3+\varepsilon)$-approximation for (unweighted) Maximum Matching (MM) by Crouch et al. [ESA'13]. Both algorithms use space $\tilde{O}(n)$. We give the following results: 1. We give a $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for MWM with space $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nL})$. Under the reasonable assumption that the graphs spanned by the edges in each sliding window are simple, our algorithm uses space $\tilde{O}(n \sqrt{n})$. 2. In the $\tilde{O}(n)$ space regime, we give a $(3+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for MWM, thereby closing the gap between the best-known approximation ratio for MWM and MM. Similar to Biabani et al.'s MWM algorithm, both our algorithms execute multiple instances of the $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation $\tilde{O}(n)$-space streaming algorithm for MWM by Paz and Schwartzman [SODA'17] on different portions of the stream. Our improvements are obtained by selecting these substreams differently. Furthermore, our $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm runs the Paz-Schwartzman algorithm in reverse direction over some parts of the stream, and in forward direction over other parts, which allows for an improved approximation guarantee at the cost of increased space requirements.

preprint2022arXiv

Improved Massively Parallel Computation Algorithms for MIS, Matching, and Vertex Cover

We present $O(\log\log n)$-round algorithms in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model, with $\tilde{O}(n)$ memory per machine, that compute a maximal independent set, a $1+ε$ approximation of maximum matching, and a $2+ε$ approximation of minimum vertex cover, for any $n$-vertex graph and any constant $ε>0$. These improve the state of the art as follows: - Our MIS algorithm leads to a simple $O(\log\log Δ)$-round MIS algorithm in the Congested Clique model of distributed computing, which improves on the $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\log Δ})$-round algorithm of Ghaffari [PODC'17]. - Our $O(\log\log n)$-round $(1+ε)$-approximate maximum matching algorithm simplifies or improves on the following prior work: $O(\log^2\log n)$-round $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm of Czumaj et al. [STOC'18] and $O(\log\log n)$-round $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm of Assadi et al. [SODA'19]. - Our $O(\log\log n)$-round $(2+ε)$-approximate minimum vertex cover algorithm improves on an $O(\log\log n)$-round $O(1)$-approximation of Assadi et al. [arXiv'17].

preprint2021arXiv

Frequent Elements with Witnesses in Data Streams

Detecting frequent elements is among the oldest and most-studied problems in the area of data streams. Given a stream of $m$ data items in $\{1, 2, \dots, n\}$, the objective is to output items that appear at least $d$ times, for some threshold parameter $d$, and provably optimal algorithms are known today. However, in many applications, knowing only the frequent elements themselves is not enough: For example, an Internet router may not only need to know the most frequent destination IP addresses of forwarded packages, but also the timestamps of when these packages appeared or any other meta-data that "arrived" with the packages, e.g., their source IP addresses. In this paper, we introduce the witness version of the frequent elements problem: Given a desired approximation guarantee $α\ge 1$ and a desired frequency $d \le Δ$, where $Δ$ is the frequency of the most frequent item, the objective is to report an item together with at least $d / α$ timestamps of when the item appeared in the stream (or any other meta-data that arrived with the items). We give provably optimal algorithms for both the insertion-only and insertion-deletion stream settings: In insertion-only streams, we show that space $\tilde{O}(n + d \cdot n^{\frac{1}α})$ is necessary and sufficient for every integral $1 \le α\le \log n$. In insertion-deletion streams, we show that space $\tilde{O}(\frac{n \cdot d}{α^2})$ is necessary and sufficient, for every $α\le \sqrt{n}$.

preprint2020arXiv

Optimal Lower Bounds for Matching and Vertex Cover in Dynamic Graph Streams

In this paper, we give simple optimal lower bounds on the one-way two-party communication complexity of approximate Maximum Matching and Minimum Vertex Cover with deletions. In our model, Alice holds a set of edges and sends a single message to Bob. Bob holds a set of edge deletions, which form a subset of Alice's edges, and needs to report a large matching or a small vertex cover in the graph spanned by the edges that are not deleted. Our results imply optimal space lower bounds for insertion-deletion streaming algorithms for Maximum Matching and Minimum Vertex Cover. Previously, Assadi et al. [SODA 2016] gave an optimal space lower bound for insertion-deletion streaming algorithms for Maximum Matching via the simultaneous model of communication. Our lower bound is simpler and stronger in several aspects: The lower bound of Assadi et al. only holds for algorithms that (1) are able to process streams that contain a triple exponential number of deletions in $n$, the number of vertices of the input graph; (2) are able to process multi-graphs; and (3) never output edges that do not exist in the input graph when the randomized algorithm errs. In contrast, our lower bound even holds for algorithms that (1) rely on short ($O(n^2)$-length) input streams; (2) are only able to process simple graphs; and (3) may output non-existing edges when the algorithm errs.