Researcher profile

Christian Guckelsberger

Christian Guckelsberger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Artificial Intelligence Human-Computer Interaction Multimedia Robotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline

3works

0followers

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Cine-AI: Generating Video Game Cutscenes in the Style of Human Directors

Cutscenes form an integral part of many video games, but their creation is costly, time-consuming, and requires skills that many game developers lack. While AI has been leveraged to semi-automate cutscene production, the results typically lack the internal consistency and uniformity in style that is characteristic of professional human directors. We overcome this shortcoming with Cine-AI, an open-source procedural cinematography toolset capable of generating in-game cutscenes in the style of eminent human directors. Implemented in the popular game engine Unity, Cine-AI features a novel timeline and storyboard interface for design-time manipulation, combined with runtime cinematography automation. Via two user studies, each employing quantitative and qualitative measures, we demonstrate that Cine-AI generates cutscenes that people correctly associate with a target director, while providing above-average usability. Our director imitation dataset is publicly available, and can be extended by users and film enthusiasts.

preprint2022arXiv

How Does Embodiment Affect the Human Perception of Computational Creativity? An Experimental Study Framework

Which factors influence the human assessment of creativity exhibited by a computational system is a core question of computational creativity (CC) research. Recently, the system's embodiment has been put forward as such a factor, but empirical studies of its effect are lacking. To this end, we propose an experimental framework which isolates the effect of embodiment on the perception of creativity from its effect on creativity per se. We not only manipulate the system's embodiment, but also the perceptual evidence as the basis for the human creativity assessment. We motivate the core framework with embodiment and perceptual evidence as independent and the creative process as controlled variable, and we provide recommendations on measuring the assessment of creativity as dependent variable. We hope the framework will inspire others to study the human perception of embodied CC in a principled manner.

preprint2020arXiv

Modelling serendipity in a computational context

The term serendipity describes a creative process that develops, in context, with the active participation of a creative agent, but not entirely within that agent's control. While a system cannot be made to perform serendipitously on demand, we argue that its $\mathit{serendipity\ potential}$ can be increased by means of a suitable system architecture and other design choices. We distil a unified description of serendipitous occurrences from historical theorisations of serendipity and creativity. This takes the form of a framework with six phases: $\mathit{perception}$, $\mathit{attention}$, $\mathit{interest}$, $\mathit{explanation}$, $\mathit{bridge}$, and $\mathit{valuation}$. We then use this framework to organise a survey of literature in cognitive science, philosophy, and computing, which yields practical definitions of the six phases, along with heuristics for implementation. We use the resulting model to evaluate the serendipity potential of four existing systems developed by others, and two systems previously developed by two of the authors. Most existing research that considers serendipity in a computing context deals with serendipity as a service; here we relate theories of serendipity to the development of autonomous systems and computational creativity practice. We argue that serendipity is not teleologically blind, and outline representative directions for future applications of our model. We conclude that it is feasible to equip computational systems with the potential for serendipity, and that this could be beneficial in varied computational creativity/AI applications, particularly those designed to operate responsively in real-world contexts.