Researcher profile

Chris Cornelis

Chris Cornelis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fuzzy granular approximation classifier

In this article, a new Fuzzy Granular Approximation Classifier (FGAC) is introduced. The classifier is based on the previously introduced concept of the granular approximation and its multi-class classification case. The classifier is instance-based and its biggest advantage is its local transparency i.e., the ability to explain every individual prediction it makes. We first develop the FGAC for the binary classification case and the multi-class classification case and we discuss its variation that includes the Ordered Weighted Average (OWA) operators. Those variations of the FGAC are then empirically compared with other locally transparent ML methods. At the end, we discuss the transparency of the FGAC and its advantage over other locally transparent methods. We conclude that while the FGAC has similar predictive performance to other locally transparent ML models, its transparency can be superior in certain cases.

preprint2022arXiv

Multi-class granular approximation by means of disjoint and adjacent fuzzy granules

In granular computing, fuzzy sets can be approximated by granularly representable sets that are as close as possible to the original fuzzy set w.r.t. a given closeness measure. Such sets are called granular approximations. In this article, we introduce the concepts of disjoint and adjacent granules and we examine how the new definitions affect the granular approximations. First, we show that the new concepts are important for binary classification problems since they help to keep decision regions separated (disjoint granules) and at the same time to cover as much as possible of the attribute space (adjacent granules). Later, we consider granular approximations for multi-class classification problems leading to the definition of a multi-class granular approximation. Finally, we show how to efficiently calculate multi-class granular approximations for Łukasiewicz fuzzy connectives. We also provide graphical illustrations for a better understanding of the introduced concepts.

preprint2022arXiv

Optimised one-class classification performance

We provide a thorough treatment of one-class classification with hyperparameter optimisation for five data descriptors: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nearest Neighbour Distance (NND), Localised Nearest Neighbour Distance (LNND), Local Outlier Factor (LOF) and Average Localised Proximity (ALP). The hyperparameters of SVM and LOF have to be optimised through cross-validation, while NND, LNND and ALP allow an efficient form of leave-one-out validation and the reuse of a single nearest-neighbour query. We experimentally evaluate the effect of hyperparameter optimisation with 246 classification problems drawn from 50 datasets. From a selection of optimisation algorithms, the recent Malherbe-Powell proposal optimises the hyperparameters of all data descriptors most efficiently. We calculate the increase in test AUROC and the amount of overfitting as a function of the number of hyperparameter evaluations. After 50 evaluations, ALP and SVM significantly outperform LOF, NND and LNND, and LOF and NND outperform LNND. The performance of ALP and SVM is comparable, but ALP can be optimised more efficiently so constitutes a good default choice. Alternatively, using validation AUROC as a selection criterion between ALP or SVM gives the best overall result, and NND is the least computationally demanding option. We thus end up with a clear trade-off between three choices, allowing practitioners to make an informed decision.